I am starting with the second example in the SPARQL recommendation: https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-update/#example_2
I construct a model with the "data before" data. I construct an UpdateRequest as per the snippet I execute UpdateAction.execute( updateRequest, model); should the model reflect the "data after" data? Specifically, should the additional prefix be added to the prefix mapping. I can see arguments for it not working with remote systems but it seems to me that local models should be updated to include the prefix mapping. Was this a design decision or is it a bug? Claude -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web <http://like-like.xenei.com> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
