I didn't think so but the examples would imply that it is. Thx.
On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 4:37 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > Prefixes are not part of SPARQL Update. > > > On 03/06/17 14:36, Claude Warren wrote: > >> I am starting with the second example in the SPARQL recommendation: >> >> https://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-update/#example_2 >> >> I construct a model with the "data before" data. >> >> I construct an UpdateRequest as per the snippet >> >> I execute >> >> UpdateAction.execute( updateRequest, model); >> >> should the model reflect the "data after" data? Specifically, should the >> additional prefix be added to the prefix mapping. >> >> I can see arguments for it not working with remote systems but it seems >> to >> me that local models should be updated to include the prefix mapping. Was >> this a design decision or is it a bug? >> >> Claude >> >> >> -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web <http://like-like.xenei.com> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
