I just commented them out in the poms. I too was just trying to get something to compile. I figured once the compile worked it would be possible to go back and work with the plugin projects to get them fixed.
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > No branch but maybe we need one. I was just trying to something/anything > to run. > > What did you do - remove their use pro-tem? > > Andy > > mvn versions:display-plugin-updates ==> > > The following plugin updates are available: > org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin ................. 2.5.3 -> 2.5.4 > maven-checkstyle-plugin ................................ 2.15 -> 2.17 > maven-pmd-plugin ......................................... 3.4 -> 3.6 > maven-shade-plugin ..................................... 2.3 -> 2.4.3 > maven-surefire-report-plugin ....................... 2.18.1 -> 2.19.1 > > [WARNING] The following plugins do not have their version specified: > maven-compiler-plugin ...................................... 3.5.1 > maven-dependency-plugin .................... (from super-pom) 2.10 > maven-enforcer-plugin ...................................... 1.4.1 > maven-jar-plugin ........................................... 3.0.0 > maven-javadoc-plugin ...................................... 2.10.3 > maven-resources-plugin ....................................... 2.7 > maven-source-plugin ........................................ 3.0.0 > maven-surefire-plugin ..................................... 2.19.1 > > > > > On 20/08/17 19:29, Claude Warren wrote: > >> Andy, >> >> Is there a branch for the java 9 work? it looks like the >> maven-enforcer-plugin is causing problems. As I recall there were several >> enforcer/reporting plugins that caused problems (Rat included I think). >> >> I also note that there is an issue with the jenkins remoting software, but >> it looks like it continues to run anyway. >> >> Claude >> >> On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Claude, >>> >>> I set up a manually run job on Jenkins to help with this: >>> >>> https://builds.apache.org/job/Jena_Development_JDK9/ >>> >>> but it runs immediately into plugin problems. >>> >>> What upgrades did you disable and which upgrade to get anything to >>> minimally compile? >>> >>> Andy >>> >>> On 04/06/17 13:43, Claude Warren wrote: >>> >>> I was trying to get a PR for the java9 changes but am having significant >>>> problems running java at all. >>>> >>>> There were very few changes made for Java9 (only 1 test I thing) and >>>> several plugins that did not work. I think it would be faster to set >>>> up a >>>> bigger development box to perform the java 9 builds and fixes. >>>> >>>> Because of the problems, I am going to drop the branch and may start >>>> over >>>> again in the future. >>>> >>>> Claude >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Claude - could this be turned into a PR so we view the changes? >>>> >>>>> >>>>> And in other news, the modules vote was lost: 10 for, 13 against. >>>>> >>>>> https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=5959&cm_mc_uid=2651742 >>>>> 7955014876736746&cm_mc_sid_50200000=1494449092 >>>>> >>>>> What that means for Java9 timescale is anyone's guess. >>>>> >>>>> Andy >>>>> >>>>> On 15/02/17 19:07, Claude Warren wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I have created a repository with the java9 branch in it. I have not >>>>> >>>>>> merged >>>>>> in the last big batch of changes. but take a look. I got it to >>>>>> compile >>>>>> and run the tests however, the site packaging did not work. I will be >>>>>> looking at that shortly. I also removed (commented out) >>>>>> cobertura-maven-plugin >>>>>> and >>>>>> findbugs-maven-plugin >>>>>> >>>>>> from the parent.pom. >>>>>> >>>>>> My strategy has been to comment out anything that is not core to the >>>>>> compile/test/package sequence with a goal to revisit those when the >>>>>> basic >>>>>> build functionality works. >>>>>> >>>>>> Repository is at https://github.com/Claudenw/jena >>>>>> >>>>>> Claude >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 08/02/17 09:21, Claude Warren wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> While at FOSDEM I spoke with one of the developers on Lucene. He >>>>>>> >>>>>>> indicted >>>>>>>> that there is a new version of the Maven Compiler plugin that works >>>>>>>> with >>>>>>>> Java 9. He also had some insight into Memory Mapped files and >>>>>>>> indicated >>>>>>>> that there was a big change coming in Java 10 around this. I'm not >>>>>>>> certain >>>>>>>> I understood exactly what the change was but I thought Andy and the >>>>>>>> other >>>>>>>> TDB folks might want to keep and eye out for any announcements in >>>>>>>> this >>>>>>>> area. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I will be looking at the Java 9 compiler stuff this weekend. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Claude >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks for the new news - I hadn't spotted anything about mmap files >>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Java 10 ... mainly because of not looking yet. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hopefully value types from Project Valhalla will make it. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Valhalla_(Java_language) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Andy >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web <http://like-like.xenei.com> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
