Status of plug-ins:

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAVEN/Java+9+-+Jigsaw

    Andy

On 20/08/17 20:06, Claude Warren wrote:
I just commented them out in the poms.  I too was just trying to get
something to compile.  I figured once the compile worked it would be
possible to go back and work with the plugin projects to get them fixed.

On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 8:02 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:

No branch but maybe we need one.  I was just trying to something/anything
to run.

What did you do - remove their use pro-tem?

         Andy

  mvn versions:display-plugin-updates ==>

The following plugin updates are available:
   org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin ................. 2.5.3 -> 2.5.4
   maven-checkstyle-plugin ................................ 2.15 -> 2.17
   maven-pmd-plugin ......................................... 3.4 -> 3.6
   maven-shade-plugin ..................................... 2.3 -> 2.4.3
   maven-surefire-report-plugin ....................... 2.18.1 -> 2.19.1

[WARNING] The following plugins do not have their version specified:
   maven-compiler-plugin ...................................... 3.5.1
   maven-dependency-plugin .................... (from super-pom) 2.10
   maven-enforcer-plugin ...................................... 1.4.1
   maven-jar-plugin ........................................... 3.0.0
   maven-javadoc-plugin ...................................... 2.10.3
   maven-resources-plugin ....................................... 2.7
   maven-source-plugin ........................................ 3.0.0
   maven-surefire-plugin ..................................... 2.19.1




On 20/08/17 19:29, Claude Warren wrote:

Andy,

Is there a branch for the java 9 work?  it looks like the
maven-enforcer-plugin is causing problems.  As I recall there were several
enforcer/reporting plugins that caused problems (Rat included I think).

I also note that there is an issue with the jenkins remoting software, but
it looks like it continues to run anyway.

Claude

On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Claude,

I set up a manually run job on Jenkins to help with this:

https://builds.apache.org/job/Jena_Development_JDK9/

but it runs immediately into plugin problems.

What upgrades did you disable and which upgrade to get anything to
minimally compile?

      Andy

On 04/06/17 13:43, Claude Warren wrote:

I was trying to get a PR for the java9 changes  but am having significant
problems running java at all.

There were very few changes made for Java9 (only 1 test I thing) and
several plugins that did not work.  I think it would be faster to set
up a
bigger development box to perform the java 9 builds and fixes.

Because of the problems, I am going to drop  the branch and may start
over
again in the future.

Claude

On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:

Claude - could this be turned into a PR so we view the changes?


And in other news, the modules vote was lost: 10 for, 13 against.

https://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/results?id=5959&cm_mc_uid=2651742
7955014876736746&cm_mc_sid_50200000=1494449092

What that means for Java9 timescale is anyone's guess.

           Andy

On 15/02/17 19:07, Claude Warren wrote:

I have created a repository with the java9 branch in it.  I have not

merged
in the last big batch of changes.  but take a look.  I got it to
compile
and run the tests however, the site packaging did not work.  I will be
looking at that shortly.  I also removed (commented out)
cobertura-maven-plugin
and
findbugs-maven-plugin

from the parent.pom.

My strategy has been to comment out anything that is not core to the
compile/test/package sequence with a goal to revisit those when the
basic
build functionality works.

Repository is at  https://github.com/Claudenw/jena

Claude

On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 10:17 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]>
wrote:



On 08/02/17 09:21, Claude Warren wrote:

While at FOSDEM I spoke with one of the developers on Lucene.  He

indicted
that there is a new version of the Maven Compiler plugin that works
with
Java 9.  He also had some insight into Memory Mapped files and
indicated
that there was a big change coming in Java 10 around this.  I'm not
certain
I understood exactly what the change was but I thought Andy and the
other
TDB folks might want to keep and eye out for any announcements in
this
area.

I will be looking at the Java 9 compiler stuff this weekend.

Claude


Thanks for the new news - I hadn't spotted anything about mmap files
in

Java 10 ... mainly because of not looking yet.

Hopefully value types from Project Valhalla will make it.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Valhalla_(Java_language)

       Andy













Reply via email to