[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1585?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16569449#comment-16569449
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1585:
--------------------------------------

Github user kinow commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/456
  
    Great stuff! Noticed a few misspellings, and also had a question about when 
to use the new  `FusekiBuildLib`. But other than that looks great! Thanks for 
the new comments, and removing unnecessary code (e.g. that one that simply did 
a `return;`). :tada: 
    
    I also realized that I submitted my review at the same time you updated the 
branch with more commits I think (at least I received an e-mail from GitHub 
right after that). So apologies if my comments are now out of sync. Thanks


> Reorganize the Fuseki codebase to split the server engine classes from the 
> webapp classes
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-1585
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1585
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Fuseki
>    Affects Versions: Jena 3.8.0
>            Reporter: Andy Seaborne
>            Assignee: Andy Seaborne
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: Jena 3.9.0
>
>
> This is a step towards separate packages for the fuseki server engine (the 
> servlets, request routing, some Jetty related support code) and the webapp 
> version of Fuseki that becomes the war and standalong jar in 
> jena-fuseki-server.
> This first step is code reorganization with module jena-fuseki-core to put 
> the webapp java code it separate packages to the rest of the engine.
> When split, the current jena-fuseki-core tests would go into 
> jena-fuseki-weabpp because they test the full server. The non-UI embeddable 
> server jena-fuseki-embedded and jena-fuseki-basic already gets test in the 
> integration tests.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to