[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16939471#comment-16939471
 ] 

Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1765:
-------------------------------------

We don't use site:site for the site.

There seem to be agreement about moving the site to Jekyll.

How would this all fit together?

 

> Ensure that maven site:site and site:stage will build a proper jena site.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-1765
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1765
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Story
>    Affects Versions: Jena 3.13.0
>            Reporter: Claude Warren
>            Assignee: Claude Warren
>            Priority: Minor
>   Original Estimate: 0.05h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0.05h
>
> This change is achieve 3 things:
> 1) To get the site:site and site:stage to execute correctly.  Correctly is 
> defined as generating a number of standard reports
> javadoc - java documentation
> surefire - test execution
> jacoco - test coverage
> PMD - coding rules
> CPD - duplicate code detection
> spotbuts - bug detection
> checkstyle - style checking (disabled until we can come up with the minimum 
> rules)
> 2) The site:site and site:stage should attempt to generate the public facing 
> site complete with formatting as it exists now.
> 3) The site:site and site:stage should be modified to add the reports for the 
> components to the web site.  This will entail discussion concerning where 
> they should go in the structure.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to