[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1765?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16939757#comment-16939757
]
Andy Seaborne commented on JENA-1765:
-------------------------------------
Did you try ajs6f's sonar? JENA-1704
Sonar makes some interesting reading but a plain, untuned report is much too
large.
I think you're conflating audiences. The documentation is for users (and isn't
static pages - it's generated with a static site generator). You seem to want
it for committer/developers.
I've written before about the impact I think that will/will not have so I won't
repeat it here.
> Ensure that maven site:site and site:stage will build a proper jena site.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-1765
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1765
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Story
> Affects Versions: Jena 3.13.0
> Reporter: Claude Warren
> Assignee: Claude Warren
> Priority: Minor
> Original Estimate: 0.05h
> Remaining Estimate: 0.05h
>
> This change is achieve 3 things:
> 1) To get the site:site and site:stage to execute correctly. Correctly is
> defined as generating a number of standard reports
> javadoc - java documentation
> surefire - test execution
> jacoco - test coverage
> PMD - coding rules
> CPD - duplicate code detection
> spotbuts - bug detection
> checkstyle - style checking (disabled until we can come up with the minimum
> rules)
> 2) The site:site and site:stage should attempt to generate the public facing
> site complete with formatting as it exists now.
> 3) The site:site and site:stage should be modified to add the reports for the
> components to the web site. This will entail discussion concerning where
> they should go in the structure.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
