[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17080475#comment-17080475
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1880:
-------------------------------------------------------

Commit 8399c6b1b83892a43c6e0ed04393dae684c1b7e9 in jena's branch 
refs/heads/master from Andy Seaborne
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;h=8399c6b ]

JENA-1880: ResultSetWriterJSON using Nodes


> Rewrite ResultSetWriterJSON to work using Nodes.
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JENA-1880
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1880
>             Project: Apache Jena
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: ARQ
>    Affects Versions: Jena 3.14.0
>            Reporter: Andy Seaborne
>            Assignee: Andy Seaborne
>            Priority: Major
>             Fix For: Jena 3.15.0
>
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> ResultSetWriterJSON executes by reading  Model API RDFNodes (Resources, 
> Literal) from the ResultSet.
> It could be made to execute reading graph-level Nodes.
> In order to incorporate RDF*, the result set form needs to handle triple 
> terms. There may not be a direct class for these in the Model API.
> To separate the decisions about the Model API, rework ResultSetWriterJSON to 
> work on Nodes not ModelAPI classes.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to