[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1880?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17080476#comment-17080476
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1880:
-------------------------------------------------------
Commit cbdba5edb47041a4181a00bd7660e5d4c212530a in jena's branch
refs/heads/master from Andy Seaborne
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=jena.git;h=cbdba5e ]
Merge pull request #724 from afs/jena1880-resultset-writer-json
JENA-1880: ResultSetWriterJSON using Nodes
> Rewrite ResultSetWriterJSON to work using Nodes.
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-1880
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1880
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Task
> Components: ARQ
> Affects Versions: Jena 3.14.0
> Reporter: Andy Seaborne
> Assignee: Andy Seaborne
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: Jena 3.15.0
>
> Time Spent: 0.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> ResultSetWriterJSON executes by reading Model API RDFNodes (Resources,
> Literal) from the ResultSet.
> It could be made to execute reading graph-level Nodes.
> In order to incorporate RDF*, the result set form needs to handle triple
> terms. There may not be a direct class for these in the Model API.
> To separate the decisions about the Model API, rework ResultSetWriterJSON to
> work on Nodes not ModelAPI classes.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
