[x] +1 Yes, issue 1499 looks like a real show stopper to me.
On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 3:55 PM Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena 4.6.1 > This is a bugfix release for GH-1499. > This is the first release candidate. > > The deadline is > > Monday, 5th September 2022 at 12:00 UTC > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > > ==== Items in this release > > Fix for TDB2 issue causing Fuseki to stop working after > 64K requests. > > https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/1499 > > ==== Release Vote > > Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. > Please download and test the proposed release. > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1054 > > Proposed dist/ area: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/ > > Keys: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS > > Git commit (browser URL): 05e57c0305 > https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/05e57c0305 > > Git Commit Hash: > 05e57c0305310befe6afa780edb9f0b23aae6b66 > > Git Commit Tag: > jena-4.6.1 > > This vote will be open until at least > > Monday, 5th September 2022 at 12:00 UTC > > If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work > for you, please email within the schedule above. > > Thanks, > > Andy > > Checking: > > + are the GPG signatures fine? > + are the checksums correct? > + is there a source archive? > + can the source archive be built? > (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time) > + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact > (both source and binary artifacts)? > + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? > if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? > + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources? > -- --- Marco Neumann