[X] +1

Thanks!!

On Fri, 2 Sep 2022, 3:42 am Marco Neumann, <marco.neum...@gmail.com> wrote:

> [x] +1
>
> Yes, issue 1499 looks like a real show stopper to me.
>
> On Thu, Sep 1, 2022 at 3:55 PM Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena 4.6.1
> > This is a bugfix release for GH-1499.
> > This is the first release candidate.
> >
> > The deadline is
> >
> >      Monday, 5th September 2022 at 12:00 UTC
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> >          [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >          [ ]  0 Don't care
> >          [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> >
> > ==== Items in this release
> >
> > Fix for TDB2 issue causing Fuseki to stop working after
> > 64K requests.
> >
> >    https://github.com/apache/jena/issues/1499
> >
> > ==== Release Vote
> >
> > Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
> > Please download and test the proposed release.
> >
> > Staging repository:
> >    https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1054
> >
> > Proposed dist/ area:
> >    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
> >
> > Keys:
> >    https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
> >
> > Git commit (browser URL): 05e57c0305
> >    https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/05e57c0305
> >
> > Git Commit Hash:
> >    05e57c0305310befe6afa780edb9f0b23aae6b66
> >
> > Git Commit Tag:
> >    jena-4.6.1
> >
> > This vote will be open until at least
> >
> >      Monday, 5th September 2022 at 12:00 UTC
> >
> > If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
> > for you, please email within the schedule above.
> >
> >      Thanks,
> >
> >       Andy
> >
> > Checking:
> >
> > + are the GPG signatures fine?
> > + are the checksums correct?
> > + is there a source archive?
> > + can the source archive be built?
> >            (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
> > + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
> >            (both source and binary artifacts)?
> > + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> > + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
> >             if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
> > + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
> >
>
>
> --
>
>
> ---
> Marco Neumann
>

Reply via email to