interesting Andy, they did not make it into my inbox. must have ended up in the spam folder.
Thanks, Marco On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 4:49 PM Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > > > On 16/01/2025 15:38, Marco Neumann wrote: > > BTW Andy you did not send out an ANN for Apache Jena 5.2.0 and Apache > Jena > > 5.1.0 as far as I can see. Is this correct? > > They were sent to the user list. > > > https://lists.apache.org/list?us...@jena.apache.org:lte=1y:&header_subject=[ANN] > > > > > Best, > > Marco > > > > On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 3:20 PM Marco Neumann <marco.neum...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> I am getting a build error at > >> > >> [INFO] Apache Jena - Fuseki Server Main ................... FAILURE [ > >> 10.748 s] > >> > >> [INFO] Tests run: 2, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: > >> 0.049 s -- in org.apache.jena.fuseki.mod.metrics.TestModPrometheus > >> [INFO] Running org.apache.jena.fuseki.mod.shiro.TestModShiro > >> [ERROR] Tests run: 5, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: > >> 0.107 s <<< FAILURE! -- in org.apache.jena.fuseki.mod.shiro.TestModShiro > >> [ERROR] org.apache.jena.fuseki.mod.shiro.TestModShiro.access_localhost > -- > >> Time elapsed: 0.005 s <<< ERROR! > >> org.apache.jena.atlas.web.HttpException: Bad URL: > >> http://2a01:4f9:3051:1bae:0:0:0:2%enp4s0:45605/public/ds?default > starting > >> at character 33 > > What's your IPv6 address? > > >> at org.apache.jena.http.HttpLib.toRequestURI(HttpLib.java:361) > >> at org.apache.jena.http.HttpLib.newGetRequest(HttpLib.java:439) > >> at > org.apache.jena.http.HttpRDF.execGetToInput(HttpRDF.java:163) > >> at > org.apache.jena.http.HttpRDF.httpGetToStream(HttpRDF.java:133) > >> at > org.apache.jena.http.HttpRDF.httpGetToStream(HttpRDF.java:128) > >> at org.apache.jena.sparql.exec.http.GSP.GET(GSP.java:148) > >> at > >> > org.apache.jena.fuseki.mod.shiro.TestModShiro.attempt(TestModShiro.java:230) > >> at > >> > org.apache.jena.fuseki.mod.shiro.TestModShiro.attemptByAddr(TestModShiro.java:214) > >> at > >> > org.apache.jena.fuseki.mod.shiro.TestModShiro.attemptByAddr(TestModShiro.java:208) > >> at > >> > org.apache.jena.fuseki.mod.shiro.TestModShiro.access_localhost(TestModShiro.java:119) > >> at java.base/java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:580) > >> at java.base/java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1596) > >> at java.base/java.util.ArrayList.forEach(ArrayList.java:1596) > >> Caused by: java.net.URISyntaxException: Malformed escape pair at index > 33: > >> http://2a01:4f9:3051:1bae:0:0:0:2%enp4s0:45605/public/ds?default > >> at java.base/java.net.URI$Parser.fail(URI.java:2995) > >> at java.base/java.net.URI$Parser.scanEscape(URI.java:3123) > >> at java.base/java.net.URI$Parser.scan(URI.java:3146) > >> at java.base/java.net.URI$Parser.parseAuthority(URI.java:3287) > >> at > java.base/java.net.URI$Parser.parseHierarchical(URI.java:3240) > >> at java.base/java.net.URI$Parser.parse(URI.java:3196) > >> at java.base/java.net.URI.<init>(URI.java:645) > >> at org.apache.jena.http.HttpLib.toRequestURI(HttpLib.java:352) > >> > >> > >> Best, > >> Marco > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Jan 16, 2025 at 11:25 AM Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> Here is a vote on the first release candidate for > >>> Apache Jena version 5.3.0. > >>> > >>> ==== Release Vote > >>> > >>> This vote will be open until at least > >>> > >>> Tuesday 21th January 2025 at 08:00 UTC > >>> > >>> Please vote to approve this release: > >>> > >>> [ ] +1 Approve the release > >>> [ ] 0 Don't care > >>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > >>> > >>> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. > >>> Please download and test the proposed release. See the checklist below. > >>> > >>> Staging repository: > >>> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1067 > >>> > >>> Proposed dist/ area: > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/ > >>> > >>> Keys: > >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS > >>> > >>> Git commit (browser URL): > >>> https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/2303067d36 > >>> > >>> Git Commit Hash: > >>> 2303067d362d6d69e52da0111ec6f1f23a252c8e > >>> > >>> Git Commit Tag: > >>> jena-5.3.0 > >>> > >>> If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work > >>> for you, please email to let us know within the schedule above. > >>> > >>> ==== In this release > >>> > >>> Issues in this release: > >>> > >>> https://s.apache.org/jena-5.3.0-issues > >>> > >>> Jena 5.3.0 has changes in the structure of the Fuseki server, a new IRI > >>> provider, together with a lot of clearup and simplification of Jena's > >>> use of Apache Xerces. > >>> > >>> ==== Contributions > >>> > >>> @Ostrzyciel has contributed several test cases for initialization > >>> and also cleaning up of Jena's use of Apache Xerces-derived code for > RDF > >>> datatypes: > >>> > >>> @OyvindLGjesdal has contrinbuted imporvement to the jena-text build for > >>> java21-> > >>> > >>> @Aklakan has contributed support for timeouts in SPARQL Updates, > >>> provided fixes for closing execution iterators, OpAsQuery, and for > >>> NodeFmtLib. > >>> > >>> Committers with PRs: rvesse, sszuev, kinow, arne-bdt, afs > >>> and not forgetting @dependabot > >>> > >>> ==== Fuseki > >>> > >>> The artifact jena-fuseki-main, which was the UI-less embedded simple > >>> server, now has equivalent functionality, including UI, to the > >>> Fuseki/webapp packaging. > >>> > >>> The artifact jena-fuseki-server packages jena-fuseki-main with > >>> dependencies and UI files into a single jar. > >>> > >>> It should be a drop-in replacement. There is no functionality added or > >>> removed; it is a better base for future development. > >>> > >>> Fuseki/webapp packaging for the WAR file which will continue to be > >>> produced but may not get all future Fuseki development features. > >>> > >>> ------------------- > >>> > >>> Checking: > >>> > >>> + are the GPG signatures fine? > >>> + are the checksums correct? > >>> + is there a source archive? > >>> + can the source archive be built? > >>> (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time) > >>> + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact > >>> (both source and binary artifacts)? > >>> + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > >>> + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades? > >>> if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately? > >>> + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources? > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> > >> --- > >> Marco Neumann > >> > >> > >> > > > > -- --- Marco Neumann
