Let me add here that the machine has a ipv4 and a ipv6 interface which are
both serviced. The test picks up the ipv6 interface by default in our Linux
system.

Best,
Marco



---
Marco Neumann




On Tue, 21 Jan 2025 at 14:44, Andy Seaborne <a...@apache.org> wrote:

> The VOTE passes with +1 votes from
>
>    Adam, Arne, Rob and Andy
>
> and also a vote from Marco.
>
> Marco discovered that a new Fuseki test does not work on an IPv6-only
> machine. GH-2963 is an issue for the mis-handling of IPv6 addresses in a
> test. It is only a test setup issue.
>
> On to pushing out the release and artifacts...
>
>      Andy
>
> On 16/01/2025 11:25, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Here is a vote on the first release candidate for
> > Apache Jena version 5.3.0.
> >
> > ==== Release Vote
> >
> > This vote will be open until at least
> >
> >      Tuesday 21th January 2025 at 08:00 UTC
> >
> > Please vote to approve this release:
> >
> >          [ ] +1 Approve the release
> >          [ ]  0 Don't care
> >          [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> >
> > Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
> > Please download and test the proposed release. See the checklist below.
> >
> > Staging repository:
> >    https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1067
> >
> > Proposed dist/ area:
> >    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
> >
> > Keys:
> >    https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
> >
> > Git commit (browser URL):
> >    https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/2303067d36
> >
> > Git Commit Hash:
> >    2303067d362d6d69e52da0111ec6f1f23a252c8e
> >
> > Git Commit Tag:
> >    jena-5.3.0
> >
> > If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
> > for you, please email to let us know within the schedule above.
> >
> > ==== In this release
> >
> > Issues in this release:
> >
> >    https://s.apache.org/jena-5.3.0-issues
> >
> > Jena 5.3.0 has changes in the structure of the Fuseki server, a new IRI
> > provider, together with a lot of clearup and simplification of Jena's
> > use of Apache Xerces.
> >
> > ==== Contributions
> >
> > @Ostrzyciel has contributed several test cases for initialization
> > and also cleaning up of Jena's use of Apache Xerces-derived code for RDF
> > datatypes:
> >
> > @OyvindLGjesdal has contrinbuted imporvement to the jena-text build for
> > java21->
> >
> > @Aklakan has contributed support for timeouts in SPARQL Updates,
> > provided fixes for closing execution iterators, OpAsQuery, and for
> > NodeFmtLib.
> >
> > Committers with PRs: rvesse, sszuev, kinow, arne-bdt, afs
> > and not forgetting @dependabot
> >
> > ==== Fuseki
> >
> > The artifact jena-fuseki-main, which was the UI-less embedded simple
> > server, now has equivalent functionality, including UI, to the Fuseki/
> > webapp packaging.
> >
> > The artifact jena-fuseki-server packages jena-fuseki-main with
> > dependencies and UI files into a single jar.
> >
> > It should be a drop-in replacement. There is no functionality added or
> > removed; it is a better base for future development.
> >
> > Fuseki/webapp packaging for the WAR file which will continue to be
> > produced but may not get all future Fuseki development features.
> >
> > -------------------
> >
> > Checking:
> >
> > + are the GPG signatures fine?
> > + are the checksums correct?
> > + is there a source archive?
> > + can the source archive be built?
> >            (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
> > + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
> >            (both source and binary artifacts)?
> > + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> > + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
> >             if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
> > + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?
>
>

Reply via email to