Hi, One more thing it would be nice to replace the templates icon by the one sebb proposed (open office template one)
Regards On Saturday, October 18, 2014, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > Regarding next release, I see this one that we should fix: > - https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56811 > > issue now fixed > On my side I hope (but really not sure) I will have some time to commit > the AsyncListener that would allow to plug with Graphite (as it is nearly > implemented ) and possibly lot of sources by only implementing equivalent > of AbstractJavaSamplerClient (JDBC, ElasticSearch, Redis...) ? > > By the way, could I commit it as is marking it as ALPHA and maybe other > commiters can continue working on it or do I need to have it fully > implemented before commiting ? > > Thanks > Regards > Philippe > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:16 PM, sebb <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> On 16 October 2014 21:08, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 10:04 PM, sebb <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> > >> >> On 16 October 2014 20:49, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> >> wrote: >> >> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:42 PM, sebb <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> On 16 October 2014 20:32, Philippe Mouawad < >> [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:24 PM, sebb <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> On 16 October 2014 19:48, Milamber <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Hello, >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > I propose to act as RM and to start a new release process near >> the >> >> >> >> weekend >> >> >> >> > of 31 October 2014. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > I would like to fix before the bug 56357 (Certificates >> algorithm >> >> >> >> > constraints) for a "full" Java 7/8 support >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I've commented on that bug. >> >> >> >> Ideally we need to continue to support testing insecure sites. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I agree with sebb comment. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > and change the default cipher for >> >> >> >> > Proxy server (change from SSLv3 to TLS (because of the recent >> >> security >> >> >> >> issue >> >> >> >> > with SSLv3 (POODLE - CVE-2014-3566)). >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> OK. That should not affect users, and if it does, they can >> revert to >> >> >> >> the previous value. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> I think we shoud do it the opposite, be as lenient as possible >> and >> >> for >> >> >> > people who want to ensure their server is secure document the way >> to >> >> >> switch >> >> >> > to the most secure config. >> >> >> > The lambda user is not a security expert, as such he will see >> failures >> >> >> and >> >> >> > will not easily find the way to change this. >> >> >> > While the user who wants to test security is aware of such things >> and >> >> >> will >> >> >> > know how to play with Security algorithms. >> >> >> >> >> >> AIUI the proposal here is to change the default cipher for the >> >> >> outgoing connection from the Proxy. >> >> >> I assume the intention is to better secure the connection during >> >> recording? >> >> >> >> >> >> Provided that the connection will fall back to SSLv3, it should not >> >> >> make any difference to the user. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > This is the issue. AFAIU (but may be I don't ) we intend to remove >> the >> >> > fallback to SSLv3, >> >> >> >> If that were the case, I would agree with you. >> >> >> >> But I think the proposal is merely to change the default (initial) >> cipher. >> >> >> > >> > Ok, let's see what Milamber has in mind and I will comment when >> commited. >> > >> >> >> >> > if server only understands this, recording will fails. I >> >> > doubt a non security aware user will find out the problem. >> >> > I may be a stupid user, but I must say that the first time I faced >> this >> >> > issue it took me some time to find the existing property to play >> with SSL >> >> > algorithms. >> >> >> >> That is a different matter, as it involves the JVM SSL implementation, >> >> not JMeter. >> >> >> > >> > It is not my understanding, AFAIK this is partly controlled by jmeter >> > properties: >> > # Default HTTPS protocol level: >> > #https.default.protocol=TLS >> > #https.default.protocol=SSLv3 >> > #https.socket.protocols=SSLv2Hello SSLv3 TLSv1 >> >> AIUI this proposal merely involves changing the following in Proxy.java: >> >> private static final String SSLCONTEXT_PROTOCOL = >> JMeterUtils.getPropDefault("proxy.ssl.protocol", "SSLv3"); // >> $NON-NLS-1$ $NON-NLS-2$ >> >> > >> > But your more detailed explanations are welcome, always nice to learn >> new >> > things >> >> I think we were talking about different things. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> And if in rare cases fallback does not work, the user can change the >> >> >> property. >> >> >> Obviously this needs to be documented in the release notes and >> >> >> component reference. >> >> >> >> >> >> The change won't affect the running of the generated Test Plan. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> So I'm not sure what your objection is. >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > If anyone have a blocker bug before release, please send a >> warning. >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Milamber >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > On 15/10/2014 07:24, Philippe Mouawad wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> >> What about starting a 2.12 release process. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, July 23, 2014, Milamber <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Hello, >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Currently I works on a new behavior to allow to save the >> >> settings of >> >> >> >> >>> Response Time Graph in jmx file. I think I can put on svn >> this >> >> work >> >> >> >> this >> >> >> >> >>> week. >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> I can prepare slowly the new and noteworthy section to >> release >> >> the >> >> >> >> 2.12, >> >> >> >> >>> and the screenshots in the target of September (start of). >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Milamber >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Le 22/07/2014 20:53, Philippe Mouawad a ecrit : >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> I meant: >> >> >> >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55913 >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> Not >> >> >> >> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55863 >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Philippe Mouawad < >> >> >> >> >>>> [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Hello, >> >> >> >> >>>>> A certain number of issues+improvements were commited these >> >> last >> >> >> days >> >> >> >> >>>>> which make trunk ready for a release in my opinion. >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> I think we could release a version as supporting JAVA8 >> >> correctly >> >> >> >> would >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> be >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> nice. >> >> >> >> >>>>> Furthermore we have something like 46 issues fixed for now: >> >> >> >> >>>>> - 18 Improvements >> >> >> >> >>>>> - 28 bug fixes >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> For release I see this remaining work to do plus all the >> >> release >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> process: >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> - Updates New and Noteworthy >> >> >> >> >>>>> - Update screenshot of JMS Publisher/Point to point >> >> >> >> >>>>> - Update screenshot of Synchronizing timer >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> I am still working on this: >> >> >> >> >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55863 >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Which is taking me more time than I had expected, so I >> don't >> >> >> think I >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> will >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> be able to commit it before september, and anyway it would >> be >> >> >> Beta or >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Alpha. >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> Regards >> >> >> >> >>>>> Philippe M. >> >> >> >> >>>>> @philmdot >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:32 AM, sebb <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> >> >> >> <javascript:;>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> On 26 May 2014 21:55, Philippe Mouawad < >> >> >> [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> <javascript:;>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Hello, >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Regards >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Philippe >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:46 PM, sebb <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> On 16 May 2014 06:48, Philippe Mouawad < >> >> >> >> [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> <javascript:;>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hello, >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Shouldn't we release a version at least to support >> >> officially >> >> >> >> 2.12 >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> ? >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Yes, we should probably do another release soon. >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> We had 1 report at user mailing list and 1 on french >> one >> >> about >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> people >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> using >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Java8 and having issues. >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> Are there any recent bug reports that need to be fixed >> >> first, >> >> >> or >> >> >> >> can >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> they wait for a later release? >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> I see this one: >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56292 >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Fixed. >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> And maybe this one: >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56159 >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Spurious notification that the test plan has changed >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Would be good to fix, but may be quite tricky. >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56368 >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> No source package deployed on Maven central >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> This is an enhancement request. >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> It would be very tedious to create Javadoc for each >> separate >> >> >> Maven >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> module. >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Also quite tedious to create source for each. >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> I don't see a pressing need to spend time on this, but if >> >> someone >> >> >> >> >>>>>> provides a working patch we could include it. >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>> There is one other issue that needs fixing - >> rsyntaxtextarea >> >> >> 2.5.1 >> >> >> >> is >> >> >> >> >>>>>> not available from Maven Central. >> >> >> >> >>>>>> This breaks the JMeter Maven poms. >> >> >> >> >>>>>> Can we revert to 2.5.0 or are there critical fixes in >> 2.5.1? >> >> >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Regards >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> From: *Milamber* <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> <javascript:;>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Date: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Subject: Release 2.12 >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> To: JMeter Users List <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> >> <javascript:;>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Hello, >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Currently, no date is planned. >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Milamber >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Le 11/05/2014 18:13, Sergio Boso a ecrit : >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi every body, >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> which is the scheduled date for next Jmeter release? >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> thank you >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> <javascript:;> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: >> >> [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >>> <javascript:;> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> -- >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Cordialement. >> >> >> >> >>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> -- >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Cordialement. >> >> >> >> >>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> -- >> >> >> >> >>>>> Cordialement. >> >> >> >> >>>>> Philippe Mouawad. >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>>>> >> >> >> >> >>> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > -- >> >> >> > Cordialement. >> >> >> > Philippe Mouawad. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Cordialement. >> >> > Philippe Mouawad. >> >> >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Cordialement. >> > Philippe Mouawad. >> > > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad. > > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
