ok for me thx On Saturday, November 1, 2014, Milamber <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello, > > If anyone see an objection, I would like start a release process for the > next JMeter version (2.12) tomorrow (sunday). > > Are you ok? > > Milamber > > > > On 16/10/2014 19:48, Milamber wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I propose to act as RM and to start a new release process near the > > weekend of 31 October 2014. > > > > I would like to fix before the bug 56357 (Certificates algorithm > > constraints) for a "full" Java 7/8 support and change the default > > cipher for Proxy server (change from SSLv3 to TLS (because of the > > recent security issue with SSLv3 (POODLE - CVE-2014-3566)). > > > > If anyone have a blocker bug before release, please send a warning. > > > > Milamber > > > > > > On 15/10/2014 07:24, Philippe Mouawad wrote: > >> Hi, > >> What about starting a 2.12 release process. > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> On Wednesday, July 23, 2014, Milamber <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> Currently I works on a new behavior to allow to save the settings of > >>> Response Time Graph in jmx file. I think I can put on svn this work > >>> this > >>> week. > >>> > >>> I can prepare slowly the new and noteworthy section to release the > >>> 2.12, > >>> and the screenshots in the target of September (start of). > >>> > >>> > >>> Milamber > >>> > >>> > >>> Le 22/07/2014 20:53, Philippe Mouawad a ecrit : > >>>> I meant: > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55913 > >>>> > >>>> Not > >>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55863 > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:50 PM, Philippe Mouawad < > >>>> [email protected] <javascript:;> <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hello, > >>>>> A certain number of issues+improvements were commited these last days > >>>>> which make trunk ready for a release in my opinion. > >>>>> > >>>>> I think we could release a version as supporting JAVA8 correctly > >>>>> would > >>> be > >>>>> nice. > >>>>> Furthermore we have something like 46 issues fixed for now: > >>>>> - 18 Improvements > >>>>> - 28 bug fixes > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> For release I see this remaining work to do plus all the release > >>> process: > >>>>> - Updates New and Noteworthy > >>>>> - Update screenshot of JMS Publisher/Point to point > >>>>> - Update screenshot of Synchronizing timer > >>>>> > >>>>> I am still working on this: > >>>>> - https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55863 > >>>>> > >>>>> Which is taking me more time than I had expected, so I don't think I > >>> will > >>>>> be able to commit it before september, and anyway it would be Beta or > >>> Alpha. > >>>>> Regards > >>>>> Philippe M. > >>>>> @philmdot > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 3:32 AM, sebb <[email protected] > <javascript:;> > >>>>> <javascript:;>> > >>> wrote: > >>>>>> On 26 May 2014 21:55, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected] > <javascript:;> > >>> <javascript:;>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Philippe > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:46 PM, sebb <[email protected] > <javascript:;> > >>> <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>>>>>>> On 16 May 2014 06:48, Philippe Mouawad < > [email protected] <javascript:;> > >>> <javascript:;>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>>>>> Shouldn't we release a version at least to support officially > >>>>>>>>> 2.12 ? > >>>>>>>> Yes, we should probably do another release soon. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> We had 1 report at user mailing list and 1 on french one about > >>> people > >>>>>>>> using > >>>>>>>>> Java8 and having issues. > >>>>>>>> Are there any recent bug reports that need to be fixed first, > >>>>>>>> or can > >>>>>>>> they wait for a later release? > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I see this one: > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56292 > >>>>>> Fixed. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> And maybe this one: > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56159 > >>>>>> Spurious notification that the test plan has changed > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Would be good to fix, but may be quite tricky. > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56368 > >>>>>> No source package deployed on Maven central > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This is an enhancement request. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> It would be very tedious to create Javadoc for each separate Maven > >>> module. > >>>>>> Also quite tedious to create source for each. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I don't see a pressing need to spend time on this, but if someone > >>>>>> provides a working patch we could include it. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> There is one other issue that needs fixing - rsyntaxtextarea > >>>>>> 2.5.1 is > >>>>>> not available from Maven Central. > >>>>>> This breaks the JMeter Maven poms. > >>>>>> Can we revert to 2.5.0 or are there critical fixes in 2.5.1? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > >>>>>>>>> From: *Milamber* <[email protected] <javascript:;> > <javascript:;>> > >>>>>>>>> Date: Tuesday, May 13, 2014 > >>>>>>>>> Subject: Release 2.12 > >>>>>>>>> To: JMeter Users List <[email protected] <javascript:;> > <javascript:;>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Hello, > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Currently, no date is planned. > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Milamber > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Le 11/05/2014 18:13, Sergio Boso a ecrit : > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi every body, > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> which is the scheduled date for next Jmeter release? > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> thank you > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > <javascript:;> > >>> <javascript:;> > >>>>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > <javascript:;> > >>> <javascript:;> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>>> Cordialement. > >>>>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Cordialement. > >>>>>>> Philippe Mouawad. > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Cordialement. > >>>>> Philippe Mouawad. > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > > > > > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
