On 12 March 2016 at 12:50, Felix Schumacher <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 12.03.2016 um 13:42 schrieb sebb: >> >> Would it be possible to add another page showing the logos at normal size? > > I have added a link to a page with them at normal size (which I interpreted > as 88px height).
Thanks! The existing logo is 182x88; the new ones are scaled to 259x88, which should fit OK in existing layouts (the height is generally more critical). I think they all look good; much cleaner than the previous logo. I prefer the ones with black or grey TM; the red TM stands out too much for me and unbalances the look slightly In jmeter5.svg the TM is too much in the background. I cannot decide between jmeter.svg, 4 or 6. Thanks very much for doing this. > I also added a note, that I converted the TM to path, so that missing fonts > didn't change the image. > > Felix > > >> >> >> On 12 March 2016 at 10:41, Felix Schumacher >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Am 12.03.2016 um 11:05 schrieb Vladimir Sitnikov: >>>> >>>> Assuming all the TMs are san-serif, my order of preference is #1 (with >>>> J fully red like in #6), #6, #3 (with regular letter thickness like in >>>> #1) >>>> >>>> Felix, was the kerning fully automated? Have you adjusted it? >>>> The distance between J and M varies from logo to logo. It looks a bit >>>> odd. >>>> I wonder what is the "proper" distance. I think smaller gap would do >>>> better. >>> >>> The kerning was done manually. All logos are basically the same except >>> the >>> colors. The first one (jmeter.svg) has no border, which makes the letters >>> a >>> bit more apart from each other. All the other ones should be the same >>> (border width of 3). >>> >>> Felix >>>> >>>> >>>> Vladimir >>> >>> >
