On Thursday, July 28, 2016, Felix Schumacher < [email protected]> wrote:
> Am 27.07.2016 um 14:41 schrieb Philippe Mouawad: > >> Hello, >> I think we should work on a roadmap for JMeter to ensure: >> - we prioritize some urgent work on it. >> - we give visibility on future of JMeter to users >> >> >> I see the following things from most to less urgent: >> >> - http2 support. We depend on httpclient for this >> > +1 but I think it is httpclient or jdk where the work is. Afaik, it's a priority of Httpclient no? If not, maybe we should look at other options although my preference clearly goes to hc for simplicity and uniformity. - possible rework of core architecture to at least introduce a pool of >> threads or switch to async model allowing us to take advantage of async io >> > lot of work (I think really a lot of work), but it is probably a worthy > goal for the long run I think so > > - start a migration to JavaFX , a good opportunity would be to replace the >> old browser used for html rendering >> > replacement of the browser component with javafx is a good thing. Yes that was my main intention. I don't think it's a big deal. > > Replacement of every thing? I don't know. Will javafx really be the next > big java gui? Would it be worth trying to get to a html/http gui and get > rid of swing completely? It would be a webapp ? How do you see it ? > > For the near future: > > * get a bugfix release of 3.0 I would like to commit an enhancement to generate reports from gui before. > * complete migration to httpclients new api +1 > * make recording of jsf sites easier maybe introduce more generally a Framework correlator where jsf would be 1 implementation. > * discuss replacement of logging framework +1 > * look at memory consumption of the tree view listener > ideas where: > - store only the last/first X entries > - store only marked entries (might be a header field) > > > >> As side features: >> - DSL ? >> > nice idea, but this is a lot of work > - JSON format instead of XMLfor jmx plans if dsl is too heavy change ? >> > I think xml has served us well. Every other format has to prove, that it > really can compete. > >> - Fix undo /redo feature >> > +1 for looking at undo/redo I would really love to see this one fixed or dropped. But I don't want to spend too much energy on it. > > Regards, > Felix > >> - ... >> >> Ideas welcome >> Regards >> Philippe M. >> >> >> >> > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
