You sound like very sane person, so I'd be happy to hear your suggestions on Taurus, how to help JMeter users more with lightweight format, without the need to rework underlying JMX used by JMeter.
Andrey Pokhilko On 08/10/2016 10:19 PM, Epp, Jeremiah W (Contractor) wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Andrey Pokhilko [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 2:38 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: JMeter DSL discussion >> >> As a side note, did you see Taurus project (http://gettaurus.org/), >> which tries to bring some YAML-based way to express JMeter test plans? > Funny enough, you've responded to some of my posts on codename-taurus. > How's it going? ;) > > I didn't detail it before, but we _are_ actually using Taurus, though > probably not how you expect, and not as much as I had hoped. > > Right now, we use it only to massage the final JMX test plan for adjusting > ramps, thread counts, and slaves. The config is very bare-bones, with just a > single execution. We experimented with the config merging and jmx2yaml, but > ended up spawning a separate JMeter instance for each test. From what you > said before, a slave can only be bound by one instance at a time, so we're > sort of forced to run from a single JMX source file with many thread groups. > > Cheers, > Wyatt > > Confidentiality Notice: This electronic message transmission, including any > attachment(s), may contain confidential, proprietary, or privileged > information from Chemical Abstracts Service ("CAS"), a division of the > American Chemical Society ("ACS"). If you have received this transmission in > error, be advised that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the > contents of this information is strictly prohibited. Please destroy all > copies of the message and contact the sender immediately by either replying > to this message or calling 614-447-3600. >
