I'll need to think about it. Andrey Pokhilko
04.11.2017 17:01, Philippe Mouawad пишет: > On Sat, Nov 4, 2017 at 2:52 PM, Andrey Pokhilko <[email protected]> wrote: > >> +1 from me, I think it is possible to automatically move elements from >> loaded test plans. >> > Do you have some time to contribute a patch for this if you think it's > needed ? > >> Andrey Pokhilko >> >> 04.11.2017 15:18, Maxime Chassagneux пишет: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I never use it, except for recording script, so +1 for me. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> 2017-11-04 13:07 GMT+01:00 Philippe Mouawad <[email protected] >>> : >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> Workbench element is confusing for beginners who don't understand >>>> clearly its use. >>>> >>>> Thinking more about it, I don't see today why we should still keep it. >>>> >>>> The only advantage of this element is Non Test Elements which would >>>> be made available from Test Plan directly. >>>> When running a test those element would not impact test plan. >>>> >>>> The only issue is backward compatibility, should we try to move >> elements in >>>> workbench under test plan or just mention a backward incompatibility. >>>> >>>> Users would manually move there elements to Test Plan. >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> >> >
