Hello Vladimir, What is the vote about exactly ?
AFAIU, the switch has been done no? Otherwise please clarify to me. Thanks Regards On Saturday, June 8, 2019, Vladimir Sitnikov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm glad we have progress here. > Chris moved SVN to a read-only mode, and I've cleaned Git repo. > > Please review the cleanup result at https://github.com/apache/jmeter > Unfortunately, gitbox repo ( https://gitbox.apache.org/ > repos/asf?p=jmeter.git ) misses tags for some reason, however I think it > will be resolved soon (INFRA-18499). > > Please vote regarding the contents of jmeter.git: > > [ ] +1: I support use of jmeter.git > [ ] -1: I do not support that because ... > > Here's my vote: ++1 > > Note: there were 10 open PRs which were unexpectedly closed by the removal > of "trunk" branch. > In order to proceed with PRs the same cleanup should be performed in > contributors' repositories. > After migration to Apache GitBox, committers would be able to push to PR > branches (to the relative branches of contributors repos), so PR update > could be either done by a contributor or by a JMeter committer. > I'm sure it does not block git repo review/svn->git migration. > > The modifications I did were: > 1) Remove of docs/ folder > 2) Remove docs- branches > 3) Remove "test" tags > 4) Remove RC tags (as suggested in "JMeter release creation" wiki) > 5) Remove all historical versions of the following > files: '*.{class,jar,png,gif,jtl,js,map,css,svg,odt,pdf,sxi}'. > The main case there is "old, unoptimized pngs" which literally took 40MiB > > The exact list of removed blobs is attached (see deleted-files.zip) > The log of updated/removed refs is attached (see git_push.log). > > PS. The above is the same procedure I did to produce > jmeter-git-cleanup-result with extra removal of RC tags. > > Vladimir > > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
