sebb>I think the test harness is broken in this regard, and ought to be fixed.
Ok. What do you typically do when an open-source project is broken or when it is missing a feature? sebb>It may still occur. The probability is extremely low, so it does not matter if it can occur or not. Vladimir> line numbers are the first thing to rely on sebb>I have always found it the most useful item of info I don't say line numbers are not useful. What I say is line numbers should not be treated as the first thing to look at. sebb>with editors one can go direct to the right place Build failure from builds.apache.org does not integrate with IDEs yet. Many people miss IDEs on their mobile phones/tables, and I test failure mails should be readable/understandable even without IDE/code editor. Vladimir
