Hello Mariusz,
Can you please do the following:
1) Find the line 151 of jmeter.bat:
=> set HEAP=-Xms1g -Xmx1g -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=256m
Replace current value by:
=> set HEAP=-Xms1g -Xmx1g -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=256m -Ddarklaf.treeRowPopup=false
If Linux, Find the line 166 of jmeter.sh:
Replace
: "${HEAP:="-Xms1g -Xmx1g -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=256m"}"
by:
: "${HEAP:="-Xms1g -Xmx1g -XX:MaxMetaspaceSize=256m
-Ddarklaf.treeRowPopup=false"}"
3) Restart JMeter
4) test again
Thanks
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 10:31 AM Mariusz W <[email protected]> wrote:
> The same situation on r1942-53c6db8676b868db10d668e7ede2ef36cf8241b9
> I think that adding "critical section controller" started problem. I added
> setUP/tearDown TG, and Jsr223 controller earlier without problem.
> Critical section controller (logical controller) was first element of this
> kind I added to this plan in 5.4.1-Snapshot. It was added to Test Fragment.
>
> Mariusz
>
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 10:01, Mariusz W <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Not, yet.
>> After restarting JMeter the error persist - I can't also click on most
>> disabled elements eg. TestFragments and disabled TestGroups - I can click
>> in enabled elements in disabled elements.
>> After opening the same plan in JM 5.3 everything works, so I think that
>> jmx is not damaged.
>> I will try new build.
>>
>> Mariusz
>>
>> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 at 09:40, Philippe Mouawad <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> Did you try with latest nightly build also ?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 9:38 AM Mariusz W <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>> When I added "Critical section controller" (Darklaf Intellij) - I am
>>>> not able to click on it.
>>>>
>>>> Mariusz
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 16:37, Mariusz W <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> I wil try to test my scripts from 5.3 to 5.4.1 snapshot on Windows
>>>>> next week - I downloaded LATEST
>>>>> (r1936-5bb4fbe389204290c61afbd12bac66a8ca928755) from
>>>>> https://ci.apache.org/projects/jmeter/nightlies/
>>>>> I will have some feedback I think. Now, as fast run I started my
>>>>> script with jdbc samplers + changed UI to Darklaf few times - it
>>>>> workes.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Mariusz
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 12:27, Felix Schumacher <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 11. Dezember 2020 12:16:09 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>>> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 12:09 PM Felix Schumacher <
>>>>>> >[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Am 11. Dezember 2020 11:45:22 MEZ schrieb Philippe Mouawad <
>>>>>> >> [email protected]>:
>>>>>> >> >Hello,
>>>>>> >> >What is the level of UI test done after Darklaf upgrade ?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Which level do you want to achieve?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> I have opened, saved an edited some simple test plans while working
>>>>>> >on the
>>>>>> >> recruiting issues. Nothing fancy. No problems seen on Ubuntu with
>>>>>> >Darklaf
>>>>>> >> (light intellij theme), that I have noticed.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Has somebody done Windows 7 and 10 tests ?
>>>>>> >This is where I saw most of the bugs.
>>>>>> >I'll try to do that ,but for now I didn't find time to do it yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I haven't tested yet on windows, but had planned it for the rc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >I didn't yet have time to test on Mac OS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't have that os :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >Looks a bit too early for me.
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> How long should we calculate?
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Just when we complete a minimum of tests on Mac and Windows, what do
>>>>>> >you
>>>>>> >think ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I thought, that those tests could be done on the rc, but if you want
>>>>>> to have a bit more than the minimal testing that has been performed by
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> reporters of the last issues (all windows based I believe), then we
>>>>>> should
>>>>>> wait a bit more and test actively on windows.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Give us a shout, when you feel more comfortable with the level of
>>>>>> testing. I have no real pressure on this, Linux seems to work great ;) in
>>>>>> the mean time I will try to test on windows, too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Felix
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> Regards
>>>>>> >> Felix
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >Thanks
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >On Fri, Dec 11, 2020 at 10:58 AM Milamber <[email protected]>
>>>>>> >wrote:
>>>>>> >> >
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> I can release version 5.4.1. Now?
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> On 10/12/2020 21:17, Felix Schumacher wrote:
>>>>>> >> >> > Hi all,
>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >> > I think, we have waited long enough, to give people time for
>>>>>> >> >feedback on
>>>>>> >> >> > the last release.
>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >> > Let's do another release. Who would like to act as RM?
>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >> > Regards
>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >> > Felix
>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >> > PS. I will test the next RC with Windows
>>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>>> >> >> > Am 07.12.20 um 16:06 schrieb Felix Schumacher:
>>>>>> >> >> >> Am 07.12.20 um 13:58 schrieb Philippe Mouawad:
>>>>>> >> >> >>> Hello,
>>>>>> >> >> >>> It looks like we may need to release a 5.4.1 due to some
>>>>>> >> >regressions
>>>>>> >> >> and
>>>>>> >> >> >>> issues with Darklaf.
>>>>>> >> >> >> Yes, it certainly looks like a soon next release. I would
>>>>>> like
>>>>>> >to
>>>>>> >> >wait a
>>>>>> >> >> >> few days, to see, if more problems get reported (not weeks,
>>>>>> >> >though).
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >>> Regarding Darklaf, we are having constantly since it was
>>>>>> >> >introduced
>>>>>> >> >> issues
>>>>>> >> >> >>> with it on different platforms. Jannis is very reactive to
>>>>>> fix
>>>>>> >> >those
>>>>>> >> >> issues
>>>>>> >> >> >>> which is great.
>>>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >> >>> But the issues are very impacting in terms of UI experience
>>>>>> >(at
>>>>>> >> >least
>>>>>> >> >> the
>>>>>> >> >> >>> ones I faced in the past) and we are still not stable.
>>>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >> >>> How can we do to make our releases more robust ?
>>>>>> >> >> >>> It looks like our automated test don't detect them. And the
>>>>>> >> >manual
>>>>>> >> >> tests me
>>>>>> >> >> >>> wake as part of our release process neither.
>>>>>> >> >> >>> I personally use JMeter mainly on MacOSX, only sometimes on
>>>>>> >> >Windows 10.
>>>>>> >> >> >>>
>>>>>> >> >> >>> I faced many issues on Windows as I had to use it for one
>>>>>> >> >customer,
>>>>>> >> >> this is
>>>>>> >> >> >>> how I reported them.
>>>>>> >> >> >> That's what I thought, too. I think we need more automated
>>>>>> >tests
>>>>>> >> >for the
>>>>>> >> >> >> GUI part, as one regression showed up on saving test plans
>>>>>> on a
>>>>>> >> >Windows
>>>>>> >> >> OS.
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >> @All, do you have experience testing a (Swing) GUI? What
>>>>>> would
>>>>>> >be
>>>>>> >> >a good
>>>>>> >> >> >> way to introduce this, for at least some basic stuff like
>>>>>> >opening
>>>>>> >> >a test
>>>>>> >> >> >> plan, creating one through the UI, saving it.
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >>> @Dev team, what are the OSes you use ?
>>>>>> >> >> >> Linux (Ubuntu really)
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >>> If we are not able to improve this, maybe we should switch
>>>>>> >back
>>>>>> >> >to
>>>>>> >> >> System
>>>>>> >> >> >>> LAFs.
>>>>>> >> >> >> That is always possible.
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >> Regards
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >> Felix
>>>>>> >> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >> >>> Regards
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >> >>
>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cordialement.
>>> Philippe Mouawad.
>>>
>>>
>>>
--
Cordialement.
Philippe Mouawad.
