vlsi commented on code in PR #6709:
URL: https://github.com/apache/jmeter/pull/6709#discussion_r3343959802


##########
THREAT_MODEL.md:
##########
@@ -0,0 +1,172 @@
+# Apache JMeter — Threat Model (v0 draft)
+
+> Built on Apache JMeter's existing security policy at
+> <https://jmeter.apache.org/security.html>. That page's "Security Model"
+> statements are lifted here verbatim as the *(documented)* core; this
+> document adds the threat-model structure around them (adversary model,
+> in/out scope, properties, known non-findings, triage dispositions).
+
+## §1 Header
+
+- **Project:** Apache JMeter (`apache/jmeter`), `master`, against which this 
draft was written.
+- **Date:** 2026-06-02. **Status:** draft — for Apache JMeter PMC review. 
**Author:** ASF Security team (drafted via the Scovetta threat-model rubric, 
building on JMeter's `security.html`), for PMC ratification.
+- **Version binding:** versioned with the project; a report against version 
*N* is triaged against the model as it stood at *N*.
+- **Reporting cross-reference:** §8-property violations → report privately per 
ASF process (`[email protected]` → `[email protected]`); §3/§9 
findings are closed citing this document and `security.html`.
+- **Provenance legend:** *(documented)* = JMeter's own 
docs/`security.html`/repo; *(maintainer)* = confirmed by a JMeter PMC member 
through this process; *(inferred)* = reasoned from architecture, not yet 
confirmed — each has a matching §14 open question.
+- **Coexistence:** this model is a strict superset of `security.html`; nothing 
there is weakened. `security.html` stays the canonical reporting/policy page 
and should link here for the expanded model.
+- **Draft confidence:** ~10 documented / 0 maintainer / ~26 inferred.
+- **What JMeter is:** Apache JMeter is a Java load-/performance-testing tool. 
A user builds a **test plan** (a `.jmx` file) in the GUI or by hand, then runs 
it — in the GUI, in non-GUI/CLI mode, or distributed across a controller and 
remote engines — to drive load at a *system under test* and collect results. 
Test plans may contain scripting (JSR223/Groovy/BeanShell) and therefore 
arbitrary code. *(documented — README, security.html)*
+
+## §2 Scope and intended use
+
+- **Primary use:** a **user-run tool** — the person running JMeter authors (or 
obtains) the `.jmx`, points it at a target they are authorised to test, and 
runs it locally or across machines they control. *(documented — security.html)*
+- **The user is the trusted operator.** The central design statement: *"The 
purpose of JMeter is to execute the workload specified in the input jmx file, 
which may include arbitrary code"* — so JMeter running the plan it is given is 
the intended behaviour, not an attack. *(documented — security.html)*
+- **Roles** (a tool, but distributed mode introduces a network surface):
+  - **user/operator** — supplies the `.jmx`, runs JMeter. **Trusted.** 
*(documented)*
+  - **distributed remote engine** (`jmeter-server`) — a node that accepts a 
test plan from a controller over RMI and executes it. A **listening network 
surface** in distributed mode. *(documented — distributed testing + 
security-manager guidance)*
+  - **system under test (SUT)** — the target JMeter sends requests to and 
whose responses it parses. JMeter is the *client* here. *(inferred)*
+
+**Component-family table:**
+
+| Family | Entry point | Touches outside process | In model? |
+| --- | --- | --- | --- |
+| Test-plan load + execution (GUI / non-GUI) | open/run a `.jmx`; 
JSR223/Groovy/BeanShell elements | runs arbitrary code **by design** | **In, 
but see §9 — executing the plan is by-design** *(documented)* |
+| Distributed / remote testing | `jmeter-server` RMI controller↔engine | 
network (listens) | **In — the real network boundary** *(documented)* |
+| Protocol client + response processing | HTTP/JDBC/JMS/etc. samplers; 
XPath/JSON/regex extractors | network (egress to SUT); parses responses | **In 
— JMeter as a client parsing SUT responses** *(inferred)* |
+| Report/results generation | listeners, dashboard | filesystem | **In 
(parsing result files)** *(inferred)* |
+| Plugins / properties / functions | `user.properties`, plugins, `__function` 
calls | varies | **In core; third-party plugins out** *(inferred)* |
+| `examples/`, test resources, demos | — | — | **Out** *(see §3)* |
+
+## §3 Out of scope (explicit non-goals)
+
+- **Executing the test plan the user gives it** — including arbitrary 
scripting in that plan. This is the whole purpose of the tool. A report that "a 
`.jmx` / JSR223 element can run code" is **not a vulnerability**; it is the 
documented design. *(documented — security.html)*
+- **Isolating untrusted `.jmx` files** — explicitly delegated to the user: 
*"If you want to use JMeter to evaluate untrusted jmx files, it is up to you to 
provide the required isolation."* *(documented — security.html)*
+- **Attackers who already control the machine JMeter runs on, its 
`user.properties`, its plugins, or the controller in a distributed run.** 
Operator-trusted. *(inferred)*
+- **The security of the system under test.** JMeter drives load at it; 
defending the SUT is not JMeter's job. *(inferred)*
+- **`examples/`, demo/test resources.** *(inferred)*
+
+## §4 Trust boundaries and data flow
+
+- **The `.jmx` is NOT a trust boundary — it is trusted input by design** (§3). 
The user vouches for the plan they run. *(documented)*
+- **The distributed-testing RMI surface IS a trust boundary.** `jmeter-server` 
accepts a serialized test plan + commands from a controller over RMI; an 
attacker who can reach that port (or MITM it) without the protections could get 
the engine to execute a plan — i.e. code execution on the remote host. The 
documented defense: *"when JMeter is used in distributed environment, we 
recommend setting up the security manager in order to avoid any execution of 
malicious code on the distributed architecture"*, plus RMI-over-SSL with 
keystore/client-auth for the controller↔engine channel. *(documented — 
security.html + distributed-testing docs; SSL specifics inferred)*
+- **The SUT→JMeter response path is a (softer) boundary:** if a user is 
induced to test a hostile server, that server's responses are parsed by 
JMeter's extractors (XML/XPath → XXE, regex → ReDoS, large responses → memory). 
Whether this is in-model depends on how adversarial the SUT is assumed to be 
(see §14). *(inferred)*
+- **Reachability precondition:** a finding is **in-model** if it is reachable 
(a) by a network party against the distributed-RMI surface under the 
documented/default protections, or (b) from a malicious SUT's responses 
(subject to §14), or (c) pre-execution while merely *opening* a file the user 
did not intend to be executable. Anything that requires the user to run a 
`.jmx` they chose to run is `OUT-OF-MODEL`/`BY-DESIGN`. *(inferred)*
+
+## §5 Assumptions about the environment
+
+- **Runtime:** JVM; runs as a desktop GUI app, a CLI process, or 
`jmeter-server` remote engine. *(documented — README)*
+- **The user controls the host, the `.jmx`, `user.properties`, installed 
plugins, and (in distributed mode) the controller and engines.** *(inferred)*
+- **Java Security Manager** is the documented isolation mechanism for 
distributed/untrusted-plan scenarios — but note it is the *user's* to 
configure, and the platform Security Manager is deprecated in modern JDKs (a 
§14 question on the forward story). *(documented that it is recommended; the 
deprecation caveat inferred)*
+- **Negative side-effects inventory** (inferred — wave-1/2 target): JMeter 
makes outbound network requests to the SUT by design; in distributed mode it 
listens for RMI; it reads/writes test plans, results, and properties on the 
local filesystem; it executes user-supplied scripting. *(inferred)*
+
+## §5a Build-time and configuration variants
+
+Security-relevant configuration *(documented unless noted):*
+
+- **Distributed RMI security** — the controller↔engine channel: RMI-over-SSL 
with a keystore and client auth (default on in recent versions?), plus the 
recommended **Security Manager** policy on engines. Confirm the current 
defaults. *(documented that the security manager is recommended; SSL default 
inferred)*

Review Comment:
   If we have "security manager is recommended", then we need to updated. We 
can't recommend security manager taking into account it is deprecated and 
removed.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to