sounds good On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > Most of the time we push on our github fork and then on asf when the vote > passed. > > You don't delete it from the git repo deleting the tag - that's the pitfall > Mark spoke about. > > Think deltaspike has a good doc about that: > http://deltaspike.apache.org/staging/steps_for_a_release.html > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber > <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory > <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> > > 2016-07-19 17:59 GMT+02:00 Hendrik Dev <[email protected]>: > >> Hi Mark, >> >> if the release vote fail we could just delete the tag (that was also >> the way we did it in the incubator). Otherwise not pushing the final >> release commit or tag makes it impossible to pull the release >> candidate upfront from the repo to validate it. That a chicken and egg >> problem ... >> >> How does other Apache Projects handle this? >> >> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 2:41 PM, Mark Struberg >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> > +1, source looks good, tests pass, sig ok, hashes fine, rat ok, license >> ok, notice ok. >> > >> > txs and LieGrue, >> > strub >> > >> > >> > PS: I have a small note on rolling the release itself: >> > >> > The release plugin is intentionally configured to not push to the >> upstream repo. >> > <pushChanges>false</pushChanges> >> > <localCheckout>true</localCheckout> >> > >> > Usually we should do the release run locally, test and verify all the >> bits and then push the tag + branch to a github repo or somewhere else. But >> please _not_ to the cannonical ASF repo. This happens _only_ if the VOTE >> did pass (together with propagating the staging repo) ;) >> > Reason is that we cannot easily get rid of a commit in our GIT repos... >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> On Monday, 18 July 2016, 12:42, Reinhard Sandtner < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > here is my +1 >> >> >> >> tested with my app and everything works fine ;) >> >> >> >> lg >> >> reini >> >> >> >> >> >>> Am 18.07.2016 um 08:17 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau >> >> <[email protected]>: >> >>> >> >>> +1 >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau >> >>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog >> >>> <https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Wordpress Blog >> >>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github >> >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | >> >>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber >> >>> <http://www.tomitribe.com> | JavaEE Factory >> >>> <https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> >> >>> >> >>> 2016-07-18 6:39 GMT+02:00 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>: >> >>> >> >>>> +1 >> >>>> Thanks >> >>>> >> >>>> Le dim. 17 juil. 2016 à 05:56, Reinhard Sandtner >> >> <[email protected]> a >> >>>> écrit : >> >>>> >> >>>>> Hi >> >>>>> >> >>>>> As mentioned on the list here is the release vote for johnzon >> >> 0.9.4: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> the release is >> >>>>> * >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=johnzon.git;a=commit;h=18b75f4982ab2ba1692cad9ac4d39ebb2c6444dd >> >>>>> < >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=johnzon.git;a=commit;h=18b75f4982ab2ba1692cad9ac4d39ebb2c6444dd >> >>>>> < >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-johnzon.git;a=commit;h=4ba9bca107c8f51f2e8340d05e500db19fe87366 >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> * >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Maven staging repo: >> >>>>> * >> >>>> >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1014/ >> >>>>> < >> >>>> >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1014/ >> >>>>> < >> >>>> >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1013/ >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> * >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Distribution archives (zip/tar.gz) with their hashes can be found >> >> under: >> >>>>> * >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1014/org/apache/ >> >>>>> johnzon/apache-johnzon/0.9.4/ >> >>>>> < >> >>>> >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1014/org/apache/johnzon/apache-johnzon/0.9.4/ >> >>>>> >> >>>>> < >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1014/org/apache/ >> >>>>> johnzon/apache-johnzon/0.9.4/ >> >>>>> < >> >>>> >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1014/org/apache/johnzon/apache-johnzon/0.9.4/ >> >>>>> >> >>>>> < >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejohnzon-1013/org/apache/johnzon/apache-johnzon/0.9.3-incubating/ >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> * >> >>>>> >> >>>>> The files are also here (apache-johnzon-0.9.4*) >> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/johnzon/ >> >>>>> >> >>>>> PGP release key: >> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/johnzon/KEYS >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Release note: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315523&version=12334945 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until we get 3 PMC >> >> +1 >> >>>> votes >> >>>>> and >> >>>>> no blocker is found. >> >>>>> >> >>>>> [ ] +1 yep >> >>>>> [ ] +0 don't care >> >>>>> [ ] -1 no because [fill this input with your reason] >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) >> @hendrikdev22 >> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC >>
-- Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22) @hendrikdev22 PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
