Ok Will try to adapt the impl we had and push it later today or tmr and ping here for feedbacks
Le 23 avr. 2018 18:46, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <[email protected]> a écrit : > That works for me. > I agree that having that extension into a specific module is the way to go > > Le lun. 23 avr. 2018 à 18:44, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > > Maybe raise a spec issue since we tend to be jsonb driven now. Would be > > great to not have a custom api for the id mapping. > > > > In the mean time we can push a jsonb-extra with that impl > > > > Le 23 avr. 2018 18:39, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <[email protected]> a > écrit > > : > > > > > Hey Roberto, > > > > > > I think that would be a great feature. > > > Already had this case in the past and looks like Jackson and Gson > already > > > have it. > > > > > > Gson subtypes on adapters. > > > https://github.com/google/gson/blob/master/extras/src/ > > > main/java/com/google/gson/typeadapters/RuntimeTypeAdapterFactory.java > > > > > > > > > Jackson annotations with different strategies > > > https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-docs/wiki/ > > > JacksonPolymorphicDeserialization > > > > > > We should consider adding this feature I believe. > > > > > > > > > Le mer. 18 avr. 2018 à 19:42, Roberto Cortez > <[email protected] > > > > > > a écrit : > > > > > > > Hi Romain, > > > > Thanks for the quick response. > > > > I'll have a look, > > > > Cheers,Roberto > > > > On Wednesday, April 18, 2018, 6:35:32 PM GMT+1, Romain > Manni-Bucau > > < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Roberto > > > > > > > > Yes, an adapter is the way to go using our mapper or jsonb. > > > > > > > > There should be an "animal" test showing how to do that. Just dont > > forget > > > > to use class aliases or a whitelist logic to not open a backdoor. > > > > > > > > Since the model doesnt match the java model im not a fan of that > > feature > > > > being built out of the box. In xml it is more natural but in json you > > can > > > > do it without breaking the model. For me it means the model is broken > > and > > > > must not be used as an input. > > > > > > > > Le 18 avr. 2018 19:31, "Roberto Cortez" <[email protected] > > > > a > > > > écrit : > > > > > > > > > Hi guys, > > > > > I'm trying to serialize a list of elements of multiple types and > then > > > > > deserialize it again. It does require to somehow include the type > in > > > the > > > > > serialization result to know to which type we should map to > > > deserialize. > > > > I > > > > > think this could possible be done with an Adapter and playing with > > the > > > > > JsonArray. > > > > > I was just wondering if there any kind of out of the box support > for > > > > this. > > > > > It doesn't seem so, at least I was not able to find. > > > > > Jackson for instance, includes a set of annotations that allow you > to > > > do > > > > > exactly this, without any extra / custom code. > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > Cheers,Roberto > > > > > >
