done https://github.com/apache/johnzon/blob/master/src/site/markdown/index.md#user-content-json-b-extra
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> 2018-04-23 19:03 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>: > Ok > > Will try to adapt the impl we had and push it later today or tmr and ping > here for feedbacks > > Le 23 avr. 2018 18:46, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <[email protected]> a > écrit : > >> That works for me. >> I agree that having that extension into a specific module is the way to go >> >> Le lun. 23 avr. 2018 à 18:44, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> >> a >> écrit : >> >> > Maybe raise a spec issue since we tend to be jsonb driven now. Would be >> > great to not have a custom api for the id mapping. >> > >> > In the mean time we can push a jsonb-extra with that impl >> > >> > Le 23 avr. 2018 18:39, "Jean-Louis MONTEIRO" <[email protected]> a >> écrit >> > : >> > >> > > Hey Roberto, >> > > >> > > I think that would be a great feature. >> > > Already had this case in the past and looks like Jackson and Gson >> already >> > > have it. >> > > >> > > Gson subtypes on adapters. >> > > https://github.com/google/gson/blob/master/extras/src/ >> > > main/java/com/google/gson/typeadapters/RuntimeTypeAdapterFactory.java >> > > >> > > >> > > Jackson annotations with different strategies >> > > https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-docs/wiki/ >> > > JacksonPolymorphicDeserialization >> > > >> > > We should consider adding this feature I believe. >> > > >> > > >> > > Le mer. 18 avr. 2018 à 19:42, Roberto Cortez >> <[email protected] >> > > >> > > a écrit : >> > > >> > > > Hi Romain, >> > > > Thanks for the quick response. >> > > > I'll have a look, >> > > > Cheers,Roberto >> > > > On Wednesday, April 18, 2018, 6:35:32 PM GMT+1, Romain >> Manni-Bucau >> > < >> > > > [email protected]> wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Hi Roberto >> > > > >> > > > Yes, an adapter is the way to go using our mapper or jsonb. >> > > > >> > > > There should be an "animal" test showing how to do that. Just dont >> > forget >> > > > to use class aliases or a whitelist logic to not open a backdoor. >> > > > >> > > > Since the model doesnt match the java model im not a fan of that >> > feature >> > > > being built out of the box. In xml it is more natural but in json >> you >> > can >> > > > do it without breaking the model. For me it means the model is >> broken >> > and >> > > > must not be used as an input. >> > > > >> > > > Le 18 avr. 2018 19:31, "Roberto Cortez" <[email protected] >> > >> > a >> > > > écrit : >> > > > >> > > > > Hi guys, >> > > > > I'm trying to serialize a list of elements of multiple types and >> then >> > > > > deserialize it again. It does require to somehow include the type >> in >> > > the >> > > > > serialization result to know to which type we should map to >> > > deserialize. >> > > > I >> > > > > think this could possible be done with an Adapter and playing with >> > the >> > > > > JsonArray. >> > > > > I was just wondering if there any kind of out of the box support >> for >> > > > this. >> > > > > It doesn't seem so, at least I was not able to find. >> > > > > Jackson for instance, includes a set of annotations that allow >> you to >> > > do >> > > > > exactly this, without any extra / custom code. >> > > > > Any thoughts? >> > > > > Thank you. >> > > > > Cheers,Roberto >> > > >> > >> >
