Now that the JSONB spec jar is released, I pushed the changes to move to non snapshot dependencies.
Question guys: are the changes for passing TCK small so we do a 1.1.14 or do we consider they are significant enough to produce a 1.2 instead? thoughts? -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 12:05 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > As mentionned in the related thread ("JSON-B and JSON-P TCKs") it sounds ok > for me. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le lun. 9 sept. 2019 à 11:57, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> > a écrit : > > > Hi, > > > > Romain and Mark have done a great work with the TCK. I'd like to open up > a > > vote to get a release out and fill a certification request like this one > > > > https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jsonb-api/issues/175 > > > > Any problem? > > > > > > -- > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > >
