As mentionned on the related thread 1.2.0, master is ready normally Le mer. 11 sept. 2019 à 18:18, Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> a écrit :
> Now that the JSONB spec jar is released, I pushed the changes to move to > non snapshot dependencies. > > Question guys: are the changes for passing TCK small so we do a 1.1.14 or > do we consider they are significant enough to produce a 1.2 instead? > > thoughts? > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 12:05 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > As mentionned in the related thread ("JSON-B and JSON-P TCKs") it sounds > ok > > for me. > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > < > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > Le lun. 9 sept. 2019 à 11:57, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> > > a écrit : > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Romain and Mark have done a great work with the TCK. I'd like to open > up > > a > > > vote to get a release out and fill a certification request like this > one > > > > > > https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jsonb-api/issues/175 > > > > > > Any problem? > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > >
