my own +1 Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
Le lun. 30 sept. 2019 à 15:36, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> a écrit : > Hi, > > > We tend to bypass dev dist area for nexus based releases since we grab > the > > artifact from nexus so it is as error prone to set up the dev dist area > > I guess it OK as long at it ends up on > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/johnzon/ > > > than not doing it for such releases and at the end the important part is > to > > synchronize the prod area and not the dev one > > You can publish via a svn mv so syncing is easy. > > > Fiexd the header and NOTICE year for next release - header was just my > > default template in my IDE but was not intended to be pushed like that, > not > > a big deal for the release. Thanks a lot to have caught it! > > Yes a trivial issue, thanks for fixing. > > > About Joni, you are right, it is a dependency and we don't bundle it in > > sources but some usage requires end user to import it, thought it was > saner > > to keep it mentionned here but happy to drop it for next release too if > > everybody agrees. > > Having extra stuff in LICENSE is just a documentation issue not a > licensing issue so it’s not a big deal. > > Thanks, > Justin > > > 1. https://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution#public-distribution
