I assume no answer means a no - just to close the thread.
If not the case feel free to shout please.
Le dim. 3 nov. 2019 à 20:03, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> a
écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> Just realized we had a weird enum serialization.
> Long story short, enum E { A, B, C} was correctly handled but enum E { A
> {}, B {}, C {} } was not and it is what we have when you use the enum as a
> sealed class (or abstract class).
> Since our last release has this bug (you don't get the enum name but just
> the declaring class which is not enough to get back the instance + is
> likely unwanted), do we want to quick 1.2.2?
> If so, any volunteer?
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
