Go for it

Le mar. 19 nov. 2019 à 08:01, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Hi all
>
> I can try to do it this week if there is no objection
>
> Le mer. 6 nov. 2019 à 09:12, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
> > I assume no answer means a no - just to close the thread.
> >
> > If not the case feel free to shout please.
> >
> > Le dim. 3 nov. 2019 à 20:03, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> a
> > écrit :
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Just realized we had a weird enum serialization.
> >> Long story short, enum E { A, B, C} was correctly handled but enum E { A
> >> {}, B {}, C {} } was not and it is what we have when you use the enum
> as a
> >> sealed class (or abstract class).
> >> Since our last release has this bug (you don't get the enum name but
> just
> >> the declaring class which is not enough to get back the instance + is
> >> likely unwanted), do we want to quick 1.2.2?
> >> If so, any volunteer?
> >>
> >> Romain Manni-Bucau
> >> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> >> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> >> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> >> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> >> <
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> >
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to