Hi all,

I fixed an issue about records (java 16) JSON-B annotation support - no
annotation mapping (ie our mapper) was working but not JSON-B custom
annotations and changed the path used to test "dedup" enablement to avoid
the regular issues we get about it (unsupported types, un-opened types on
recent JVM etc).

Changelog is:

PTKeySummaryAssigneeStatus
[image: Major] [image: Improvement] JOHNZON-348
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JOHNZON-348> JSON-B annotations not
supported on record constructor parameters
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JOHNZON-348> Romain Manni-Bucau
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau>
RESOLVED
[image: Major] [image: Improvement] JOHNZON-349
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JOHNZON-349> Rework dedup check code
path to ensure to only read related annotation when classmapping is loaded
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JOHNZON-349> Romain Manni-Bucau
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau>
RESOLVED


Is it ok to release 1.2.14 like that?

#348 is not hurting but #349 is worth some validations in applications
using it so was thinking about giving some opportunity to test master
before letting go out.
Just let me know if there is a blocker to release next week, some
features/fixes are awaited by users (including some related to the dedup
issue I mentionned).

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>

Reply via email to