It sounds good to me. Regards JB
> Le 20 juin 2021 à 16:31, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > Hi all, > > I fixed an issue about records (java 16) JSON-B annotation support - no > annotation mapping (ie our mapper) was working but not JSON-B custom > annotations and changed the path used to test "dedup" enablement to avoid > the regular issues we get about it (unsupported types, un-opened types on > recent JVM etc). > > Changelog is: > > PTKeySummaryAssigneeStatus > [image: Major] [image: Improvement] JOHNZON-348 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JOHNZON-348> JSON-B annotations not > supported on record constructor parameters > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JOHNZON-348> Romain Manni-Bucau > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau> > RESOLVED > [image: Major] [image: Improvement] JOHNZON-349 > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JOHNZON-349> Rework dedup check code > path to ensure to only read related annotation when classmapping is loaded > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JOHNZON-349> Romain Manni-Bucau > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=romain.manni-bucau> > RESOLVED > > > Is it ok to release 1.2.14 like that? > > #348 is not hurting but #349 is worth some validations in applications > using it so was thinking about giving some opportunity to test master > before letting go out. > Just let me know if there is a blocker to release next week, some > features/fixes are awaited by users (including some related to the dedup > issue I mentionned). > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
