Totally ok. Just to clarify, we'll do more releases as we'll need to cope with maintenance for quite a bit of time. So moving to jakarta does not mean we'll abandon 1.x maintenance in my mind. -- Jean-Louis Monteiro http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro http://www.tomitribe.com
On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 9:44 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote: > We need a 1.x last release since we have a few fixes I think but +1 to move > to v2 after and finish to impl jakarta spec. > > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > < > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > Le mar. 3 janv. 2023 à 09:41, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> > a écrit : > > > Hi all, > > > > The shading approach was fine to start, but it's not sustainable in the > > long term and a pain from a user point of view. There won't be any new > > feature implemented in the javax namespace, so I'd like to move the > current > > 1.x to a maintenance branch and move master to jakarta with a 2.x version > > so there is a clear change. > > > > Any objections? > > -- > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > >
