+1 Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> schrieb am Di., 3. Jan. 2023, 10:25:
> Totally ok. > > Just to clarify, we'll do more releases as we'll need to cope with > maintenance for quite a bit of time. So moving to jakarta does not mean > we'll abandon 1.x maintenance in my mind. > -- > Jean-Louis Monteiro > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 9:44 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > We need a 1.x last release since we have a few fixes I think but +1 to > move > > to v2 after and finish to impl jakarta spec. > > > > Romain Manni-Bucau > > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog > > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github < > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> | > > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > > < > > > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance > > > > > > > > > Le mar. 3 janv. 2023 à 09:41, Jean-Louis Monteiro < > > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> > > a écrit : > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > The shading approach was fine to start, but it's not sustainable in the > > > long term and a pain from a user point of view. There won't be any new > > > feature implemented in the javax namespace, so I'd like to move the > > current > > > 1.x to a maintenance branch and move master to jakarta with a 2.x > version > > > so there is a clear change. > > > > > > Any objections? > > > -- > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro > > > http://www.tomitribe.com > > > > > >