+1

Jean-Louis Monteiro <jlmonte...@tomitribe.com> schrieb am Di., 3. Jan.
2023, 10:25:

> Totally ok.
>
> Just to clarify, we'll do more releases as we'll need to cope with
> maintenance for quite a bit of time. So moving to jakarta does not mean
> we'll abandon 1.x maintenance in my mind.
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 3, 2023 at 9:44 AM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > We need a 1.x last release since we have a few fixes I think but +1 to
> move
> > to v2 after and finish to impl jakarta spec.
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > <
> >
> https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > >
> >
> >
> > Le mar. 3 janv. 2023 à 09:41, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > jlmonte...@tomitribe.com>
> > a écrit :
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > The shading approach was fine to start, but it's not sustainable in the
> > > long term and a pain from a user point of view. There won't be any new
> > > feature implemented in the javax namespace, so I'd like to move the
> > current
> > > 1.x to a maintenance branch and move master to jakarta with a 2.x
> version
> > > so there is a clear change.
> > >
> > > Any objections?
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to