Thanks much!

Justin

On Fri, Oct 10, 2025 at 2:55 AM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Justin,
>
> I think it's ready to be merged.
> I'll do that and try to cut a release at lunch time.
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 9:07 PM Justin Bertram <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > The PR build is green now.
> >
> > I had to change the String passed to DateTimeFormatter.ofPattern()
> > in org.apache.johnzon.mapper.converter.DateConverter since it was using a
> > character that was only valid in Java 11 (i.e. changed "v" to "z" which
> > should be equivalent).
> >
> >
> > Justin
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 1:18 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Probably yes, because it's failing only on Java 8.
> > > So for instance some parts of the java.time API were added after Java
> 8.
> > > I did not check the other failures, but probably it's also related to
> > Java
> > > 8 issues.
> > >
> > > We want to keep Java 8 compatibility on the 1.x branch because of the
> > > Apache projects using Jonhzon.
> > > --
> > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 8:09 PM Justin Bertram <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Looking at the commits on master that aren't on json-1.2.x it appears
> > > > there's only a couple of fixes that might apply.
> > > >
> > > > I sent a PR [1] for these, but the PR build is failing so I'll
> > > investigate
> > > > a bit more. Perhaps these aren't valid for 1.2.x.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Justin
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/johnzon/pull/133
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 12:28 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Justin,
> > > > >
> > > > > I can definitely help, but it depends on how urgent that is. If
> it's
> > > > > urgent, can you help with the backport part?
> > > > > I can take the release part, with or without the backport from 2.x,
> > but
> > > > I'm
> > > > > not sure I can take the time in the next couple of days to look at
> > the
> > > > diff
> > > > > and do the backports.
> > > > >
> > > > > Hopefully it helps
> > > > > --
> > > > > Jean-Louis Monteiro
> > > > > http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> > > > > http://www.tomitribe.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Thu, Oct 9, 2025 at 6:48 PM Justin Bertram <[email protected]
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > ActiveMQ Artemis uses Johnzon internally for JSON parsing and
> > > recently
> > > > a
> > > > > > user reported a memory issue [1]. It turns out that the problem
> is
> > in
> > > > > > Johnzon [2] and the fix is already on the 1.2.x branch [3].
> > However,
> > > > > > there's been no release of 1.2.x since that fix was committed.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is there any chance you guys would do a 1.2.x release soon? It
> > would
> > > be
> > > > > > even better to back-port all the fixes from 2.x before doing so,
> > but
> > > if
> > > > > > that's not an option just the current branch would technically
> > > suffice
> > > > to
> > > > > > resolve this issue.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Justin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [1]
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread/w0bcb3roj2nywk2ok8k3sky9kgmtgomc
> > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JOHNZON-396
> > > > > > [3]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/johnzon/commit/664cb73f629fd0190902a0f1080c420a509e66b0
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to