+1 I think dicussion ans agreement is needed if the project wants to get onboarded early.
Otherwise, we will be move as part of later migration anyway. - Henry On Mon, Dec 17, 2018, 8:46 AM Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org wrote: > +1, and it’s my understanding that it’s not a choice. There will be only > Gitbox, and we will move eventually whether we want to or not ☺ > > Let’s move to Gitbox, +1. > > > > Cheers, > > Chris Mattmann > > > > > > From: Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com> > Reply-To: "dev@joshua.apache.org" <dev@joshua.apache.org> > Date: Monday, December 17, 2018 at 8:45 AM > To: "d...@joshua.incubator.apache.org" <d...@joshua.incubator.apache.org> > Subject: moving to Gitbox > > > > Hi all, > > > > Given the recent announcement about gitbox.apache.org [1] (seamless > > integration with GitHub) I was wondering about moving from git-ws* to > > gitbox to allow better PR support (we can merge PRs by clicking > > *merge* button from Github), that may help us towards more and more > > effective contributions. > > > > WDYT? > > > > Regards, > > Tommaso > > > > [1] : https://gitbox.apache.org/ > > > >
