+1 from me.

On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 9:10 AM Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> you're right Chris, thanks (and +1 from me as well).
>
> Regards,
> Tommaso
>
> Il giorno lun 17 dic 2018 alle ore 17:56 Henry Saputra <
> henry.sapu...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> > +1
> >
> > I think dicussion ans agreement is needed if the project wants to get
> > onboarded early.
> >
> > Otherwise, we will be move as part of later migration anyway.
> >
> > - Henry
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018, 8:46 AM Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org wrote:
> >
> > > +1, and it’s my understanding that it’s not a choice. There will be
> only
> > > Gitbox, and we will move eventually whether we want to or not ☺
> > >
> > > Let’s move to Gitbox, +1.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Chris Mattmann
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > From: Tommaso Teofili <tommaso.teof...@gmail.com>
> > > Reply-To: "dev@joshua.apache.org" <dev@joshua.apache.org>
> > > Date: Monday, December 17, 2018 at 8:45 AM
> > > To: "d...@joshua.incubator.apache.org" <d...@joshua.incubator.apache.org
> >
> > > Subject: moving to Gitbox
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Given the recent announcement about gitbox.apache.org [1] (seamless
> > >
> > > integration with GitHub) I was wondering about moving from git-ws* to
> > >
> > > gitbox to allow better PR support (we can merge PRs by clicking
> > >
> > > *merge* button from Github), that may help us towards more and more
> > >
> > > effective contributions.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > WDYT?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Tommaso
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [1] : https://gitbox.apache.org/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to