On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 8:22 AM, pat eyler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - We need to consider what version number we might want for > > JRuby.next...1.2? 2.0? Tom suggested 3.0 since it wouldn't confuse > people > > about JRuby 2.0/Ruby 2.0. I think it's open for discussion. > > > I'd go with 1.2 ... if you skip 2.0 to avoid name confusion, what will you > do > when Ruby 2.0 does hit the streets and you want to start working towards > feature compatiblity with it?
I think we should follow Java's example and use both "1.X" and "X" simultaneously. We should also use a random generator to arbitrarily insert one or the other in all documentation, emails, etc. dean > > > > > > - Charlie > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > > > > > > > > -- > thanks, > -pate > ------------------------- > Duty makes us do things, Love make us do things well. > http://on-ruby.blogspot.com http://on-erlang.blogspot.com > http://on-soccer.blogspot.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > -- Dean Wampler http://www.objectmentor.com http://www.aspectprogramming.com http://aquarium.rubyforge.org http://www.contract4j.org
