--- Den man 7/4/08 skrev Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> FYI, we're chasing this down on the RubyGems side and
> we'll get them to
> change it back to just "gem". JRuby shouldn't
> be the only impl forced to
> have a differently-named 'gem' script.
Seems like RubyGems are already doing the right thing (no, I did not ask them
:-)).
Why would you want rubygems to change back if you attribute rubygems naming of
the gem tool as "gem" on jruby as the main reason to go for the conflicting
name "gem" instead of the friendlier "jgem" ?
Anyway, I guess I won't be able to convince you so I will just have to continue
patching the jruby installations to my liking on my own machine :-)
Find din nye laptop på kelkoo.dk. Se de gode tilbud her -
http://dk.yahoo.com/r/pat/mm
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
