On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Logan Barnett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 8, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Thomas E Enebo wrote: >> >> field_attr_reader :java_field_name [, :name_to_expose_as] >> field_attr_writer :java_field_name [, :name_to_expose_as] >> field_attr_accessor :java_field_name [, :name_to_expose_as] >> > > Could field_accessor and friends accept hash key/values for an exposed name, > and just allow you to one-line a bunch of fields you want exposed (like the > attr versions)? > > field_accessor :java_foo => :ruby_foo > field_accessor :foo, :bar, :bazz > field_accessor :foo, :bar, :bazz, :javaQux => :ruby_qux
This also looks quite reasonable to me....good idea. I kept thinking this needs to be either a hash or a list. The fact that you can mix or match between hash and symbol makes this syntax work for me. -Tom -- Blog: http://www.bloglines.com/blog/ThomasEEnebo Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] , [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
