Thomas E Enebo wrote:
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Logan Barnett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 8, 2008, at 2:06 PM, Thomas E Enebo wrote:
field_attr_reader :java_field_name [, :name_to_expose_as]
field_attr_writer :java_field_name [, :name_to_expose_as]
field_attr_accessor :java_field_name [, :name_to_expose_as]
Could field_accessor and friends accept hash key/values for an exposed name,
and just allow you to one-line a bunch of fields you want exposed (like the
attr versions)?
field_accessor :java_foo => :ruby_foo
field_accessor :foo, :bar, :bazz
field_accessor :foo, :bar, :bazz, :javaQux => :ruby_qux
This also looks quite reasonable to me....good idea. I kept thinking
this needs to be either a hash or a list. The fact that you can mix
or match between hash and symbol makes this syntax work for me.
Remember hash args can only come at the end.
- Charlie
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
