If you can't contact the original maintainer I think it will probably be
safe to just migrate it. If there's a dispute over the original name
"antbuilder" or anything, we can deal with it later (and I'd bet a
MILLION DOLLARS nobody will care if you just take it over).
- Charlie
malagant wrote:
Nick,
thanks for the advice. I will try to contact the previous project maintainer
and will then move the project to kenai.com.
If you can authorize me on kenai.com this would be a great help.
I'll keep you informed on the progress.
Cheers
Michael
Nick Sieger-2 wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:16 PM, malagant <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm not sure how this usually works, but I reviewed both Antwrap and
AntBuilder from rubyforge jruby-extras.
My conclusion ist, antbuilder provides a greate DSL for wrapping ANT and
that it is worth to be continued, IMHO.
How ist the process of moving to kenai.com? Is it necessary to inform the
initial developer or are we just doing it? Is there a FAQ for this?
Sorry, for all the answers, but I think I can spend some time on
antbuilder
and would like to use the proposed infrastructure.
I think just documenting the plans on a public list is probably
enough. Have you tried to track down and email the previous
maintainer(s)?
Also, let me know if you need an invitation to create a project on
kenai.com -- project creation isn't open everyone quite yet.
/Nick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
