Yes, perhaps there's a middle ground :) but definitely do whatever you
feel most comfortable with; having either project active again would be
excellent.
Michael Johann wrote:
Ok, I guess you are a fan of antwrap and I am a fan of the DSL of
antbuilder ;-)
Let's have a look at it. I'll get back to you asap.
In the meanwhile I'll try to get in contact with Jason.
Cheers
Michael
Charles Oliver Nutter schrieb:
Perhaps the antwrap backend could be used for antbuilder or the same
DSL could be implemented on top of antwrap?
Michael Johann wrote:
Tim,
thank you for your quick response.
Do you have the email contact of Jason for us?
You might think that Antwrap is lighter of weight, but I would like
to see the antbuilder approach because it provides a kind of a DSL,
which is widely known by Java experts.
Cheers
Michael
Tim Azzopardi schrieb:
Hi guys, I suggested to Jason Voegele that he could become the
maintainer of AntBuilder when other commitments took over (mostly
family). So I think he's the one to contact. Migrating is fine by me
if Jason Voegele is happy. The name AntBuilder, I just swiped from
Groovy so no big deal from my point of view.
Also you might want a glance at this old blog post about both projects
http://blog.aslakhellesoy.com/2006/12/18/building-java-with-jruby. (It
seemed to me that the lighter weight approach of Antwrap made more
sense than AntBuilder's dependency on LeafCutter.
Good luck with the rest.
- Tim
2009/1/27 Charles Oliver Nutter <charles.nut...@sun.com>:
If you can't contact the original maintainer I think it will
probably be
safe to just migrate it. If there's a dispute over the original name
"antbuilder" or anything, we can deal with it later (and I'd bet a
MILLION
DOLLARS nobody will care if you just take it over).
- Charlie
malagant wrote:
Nick,
thanks for the advice. I will try to contact the previous project
maintainer
and will then move the project to kenai.com.
If you can authorize me on kenai.com this would be a great help.
I'll keep you informed on the progress.
Cheers
Michael
Nick Sieger-2 wrote:
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 3:16 PM, malagant
<mjoh...@rails-experts.com>
wrote:
Hi everybody,
I'm not sure how this usually works, but I reviewed both Antwrap
and
AntBuilder from rubyforge jruby-extras.
My conclusion ist, antbuilder provides a greate DSL for wrapping
ANT and
that it is worth to be continued, IMHO.
How ist the process of moving to kenai.com? Is it necessary to
inform
the
initial developer or are we just doing it? Is there a FAQ for this?
Sorry, for all the answers, but I think I can spend some time on
antbuilder
and would like to use the proposed infrastructure.
I think just documenting the plans on a public list is probably
enough. Have you tried to track down and email the previous
maintainer(s)?
Also, let me know if you need an invitation to create a project on
kenai.com -- project creation isn't open everyone quite yet.
/Nick
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
