On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Sundberg, Patrik
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Picked the snapshot from the 13th. One thing I see when unpacking is this:
> ..
> ..
> inflating:
> jruby-1.5.0.dev/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ruby-debug-0.10.3/cli/ruby-debug/commands/show.rb
> inflating:
> jruby-1.5.0.dev/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ruby-debug-0.10.3/cli/ruby-debug/commands/source.RB
> replace
> jruby-1.5.0.dev/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ruby-debug-0.10.3/cli/ruby-debug/commands/source.rb?
> [y]es, [n]o, [A]ll, [N]one, [r]ename:
Interesting...I wonder why ruby-debug has two files with different
cases. An issue for ruby-debug to fix I imagine (though it may be
harmless). Unfortunately, I don't think anyone maintains ruby-debug
anymore :)
> Also, I tried downgrading ant to version 1.7.0 and rebuilt. The 1.8.0RC1 is
> very new and an RC so struck me it may be something related to the build.
> Doing that I also end up with a dist file where jruby -v works. I checked it
> and now I see:
> psundb...@lnpsprod1:~/t/jruby-1.5.0.dev/lib/t $ ls
> jruby/objectweb/asm/Opcodes.class
> -rw-rw---- 1 psundberg 6445 Jun 11 2009 jruby/objectweb/asm/Opcodes.class
>
> So I think there's an issue with ant causing the problem. I'm building with
> 1.7.0 going forward.
>
> Is the "official" snapshots built with 1.8.0RC1 now? Then it'd all make sense
> to me.
Thanks for the extra footwork on this! I imagine it's the same issue
on the server, and we'll make sure it uses 1.7.0 to build. I'm not
positive what version it's using right now.
- Charlie
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
