On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter <head...@headius.com>wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 4:33 PM, kristian <m.krist...@web.de> wrote: > >> A quick list, scanning build_lib... > >> > >> Already being published to Maven for releases (but not snapshots): > >> > >> bytelist > >> invokebinder > >> jcodings > >> jffi > >> jnr-constants > >> jnr-enxio > >> jnr-ffi > >> jnr-netdb > >> jnr-posix > >> jnr-unixsocket > >> jnr-x86asm > >> joni > >> > > > > as far I remember most of them are already on oss.sonatype.org and when > > using the parent pom from sonatype then you have a snapshot repo (just > > $ maven deploy > > a snapshot) and a way to deploy them to maven central. and when using the > > maven release plugin which is already configured then one just need to > get > > used to mantra > > $ maven release:prepare > > $ maven release:perform > > Some are released via codehaus. It might be worth moving everything to > sonatype so it's all in the same place. > Based on the fact it took sonatype over 3 days to push jnr-posix to maven central I might question that goal. I at least would like to know what went wrong. [I am not against moving them off of codehaus, but that issue really dragged our last release out] -Tom > > >> Not in maven, but need to be: > >> > >> coro-mock (compile only) > >> jsr292-mock (compile only) > >> unsafe-mock (compile-only) > >> yecht (1.8 yaml library...going away in 9k, but still needed in 1.7.x) > >> yydebug > >> > > best use the same setup with sonatype > > coro-mock, unsafe-mock, and yecht I know we own. Tom can confirm the > source of yydebug, but I assume it comes from the Jay codebase (we > could just annex it and push to maven). jsr292-mock we don't own, but > I can get permission to mavenize and publish it. > > > what about things like package rewriting which was/is done with > ant-jarjar ? > > That will still need to happen somehow. I assume there's a similar > plugin for maven, no? > > >> and ideally after the first build, > >> you'd only need to run Rake. > >> > > ?? so rake is going to compile as well ? and jar packing ? > > No, Rake would call Maven if jruby.jar needs to be rebuilt. > > - Charlie > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this list, please visit: > > http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email > > > -- blog: http://blog.enebo.com twitter: tom_enebo mail: tom.en...@gmail.com
