just resend since it bounced. -christian
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 11:31 AM, kristian <m.krist...@web.de> wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 5:21 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter < > head...@headius.com> wrote: > >> This seems pretty good, but is there a reason we need all the >> jruby-blah poms to be in their own directories? Could there be a >> single maven dir with pom-complete, pom-core, pom-stdlib etc? >> >> > the modules section is such a list of directory-names and each directory > needs a pom.xml to be module. the problem is only the pom - to create and > attach any jar to pom is no problem but with jruby-core, jruby-complete, > etc we a tailored pom for those jars. > > > >> One goal of this reorg is to clean up the repo root a bit, and moving >> those to top-level seems like a step backward. >> > > we can keep the current maven project with all its subdirectories no need > to them into basedir. > > but I also realized one more thing: IDE support > and for this we really need to make the main jruby artifact as straight > forward as possible. this means move the main sources into its own module > speak directory, I think the IDE support is really important - starting > with myself as eclipse user. > > I also wondered when all the dependencies are maven artifacts then there > is no difference between jruby.jar and jruby-core.jar ? not much I guess. > maybe we can call the main artifact jruby-core then and make ONE more > directory to the basedir: jruby-core ? > > - christian > >
