Ok
/******************************************* Joe Stein Founder, Principal Consultant Big Data Open Source Security LLC http://www.stealth.ly Twitter: @allthingshadoop ********************************************/ On Feb 25, 2014, at 11:22 AM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, Joe, > > Both KAFKA-1271 and KAFKA-930 have been checked into the 0.8.1. branch. The > only remaining thing is to update the doc. We can start the release vote > and prepare the doc change in parallel. > > Thanks, > > Jun > > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Joe Stein <joe.st...@stealth.ly> wrote: > >> sounds good, I updated JIRA to reflect the below >> >> On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 1:17 AM, Jun Rao <jun...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hi, Joe, >>> >>> I agree with you that KAFKA-1180 and KAFKA-1210 are not blockers and can >> be >>> moved to 0.8.2. >>> >>> I'd like to check in KAFKA-1271. It's a simple fix and improves the >>> logging. >>> >>> Sriram has a delta patch in KAFKA-930 that was waiting for the delete >> topic >>> patch to be checked in. >>> >>> I think once the above fixes are checked in, we can cut the release >>> candidate for 0.8.1. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Jun >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:34 PM, Joe Stein <joe.st...@stealth.ly> wrote: >>> >>>> I wanted to start a thread prior to starting the vote for the 0.8.1 >>>> release. >>>> >>>> There are 3 open patches still pending >>>> >>>> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20KAFKA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%220.8.1%22%20AND%20status%20%3D%20%22Patch%20Available%22%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC >>>> >>>> One patch is a slight difference between 0.8.0 and 0.8.1 with creation >> of >>>> topic in the docs and feel we need to still show/support both in some >> way >>>> in the docs. I just +1 Jay's suggestion so that can move ahead if >> there >>>> are no objections to what he has planned. >>>> >>>> The other I worked on and I don't see it as blocker (the patch can be >>>> applied for the case it resolves as there is some question to what we >> are >>>> solving and ultimately in 0.9.0 this goes away) so we could move it to >>>> 0.8.2 unless folks think it can go in 0.8.1 or should wait. >>>> >>>> I don't know anything about the Windows Bat file patch can we move that >>> to >>>> 0.8.2 also? >>>> >>>> Once these are settled I would like to prepare the artifacts and see if >>>> there are any further issues and if not start the process for calling a >>>> vote of release candidates for 0.8.1. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? Questions? Comments? Concerns? >>>> >>>> /******************************************* >>>> Joe Stein >>>> Founder, Principal Consultant >>>> Big Data Open Source Security LLC >>>> http://www.stealth.ly >>>> Twitter: @allthingshadoop <http://www.twitter.com/allthingshadoop> >>>> ********************************************/ >>>> >>> >>
