Hi Tom, Colin, I abandoned my KIP because at that time I haven't had time unfortunately to continue working on it (KIP-248) and I wanted to rework it to remove the java based client since the admin commands use Scala. Since at that time it mostly had consensus on the design I think it might be a good approach to continue. It was still on my to-dos but didn't want to interrupt KIP-422 because at that time it seemed to be active. If you're writing the email with the attempt of continuing then I can only endorse you or perhaps if you need someone to help in I could be able to join efforts (even by reviewing and participating the discussion).
My KIP didn't include reassignment quotas but I've been working on a KIP about reworking replication throttling to introduce reassignment throttling so perhaps it would make to discuss them somewhat together. I'll try to publish it soon but not sure I can until after the summit. Viktor On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 6:30 PM Colin McCabe <cmcc...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Tom, > > As you said, there were a few KIPs, but they seem to have become inactive. > > It's kind of a tough problem-- probably at least as complex as the admin > interface for ACLs. > > There's also the headache of how reassignment quotas should work. We > probably want to change that quota to actually throttle only reassignment > traffic, not just any non-ISR traffic as it does now. Or add a different > quota type? > > best, > Colin > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019, at 04:38, Tom Bentley wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I was wondering, what is the current status of efforts to add an > > AdminClient API for managing user quotas? My trawl of the list archives > > didn't turn up anything current (KIP-248 was rejected KIP-422 was > > discussed), but perhaps I missed something. > > > > Many thanks, > > > > Tom > > >
