Gonna give this another little bump. :)

Brandon Brown

> On Oct 15, 2020, at 12:51 PM, Brandon Brown <bran...@bbrownsound.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> As I mentioned in the KIP, this transformer is slightly different from the 
> current MaskField SMT. 
> 
>> Currently there exists a MaskField SMT but that would completely remove the 
>> value by setting it to an equivalent null value. One problem with this would 
>> be that you’d not be able to know in the case of say a password going 
>> through the mask transform it would become "" which could mean that no 
>> password was present in the message, or it was removed. However this hash 
>> transformer would remove this ambiguity if that makes sense. The proposed 
>> hash functions would be MD5, SHA1, SHA256. which are all supported via 
>> MessageDigest.
> 
> Given this take on things do you still think there would be value in this smt?
> 
> 
> Brandon Brown 
>> On Oct 15, 2020, at 12:36 PM, Ning Zhang <ning2008w...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello, I think this SMT feature is parallel to 
>> https://docs.confluent.io/current/connect/transforms/index.html
>> 
>>>> On 2020/10/15 15:24:51, Brandon Brown <bran...@bbrownsound.com> wrote: 
>>> Bumping this thread.
>>> Please take a look at the KIP and vote or let me know if you have any 
>>> feedback.
>>> 
>>> KIP: 
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/KIP-665%3A+Kafka+Connect+Hash+SMT
>>> 
>>> Proposed: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/9057
>>> 
>>> Thanks
>>> 
>>> Brandon Brown
>>> 
>>>>> On Oct 8, 2020, at 10:30 PM, Brandon Brown <bran...@bbrownsound.com> 
>>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> Just wanted to give another bump on this and see if anyone had any 
>>>> comments. 
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks!
>>>> 
>>>> Brandon Brown
>>>> 
>>>>> On Oct 1, 2020, at 9:11 AM, "bran...@bbrownsound.com" 
>>>>> <bran...@bbrownsound.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hey Kafka Developers,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I’ve created the following KIP and updated it based on feedback from 
>>>>> Mickael. I was wondering if we could get a vote on my proposal and move 
>>>>> forward with the proposed pr.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks so much!
>>>>> -Brandon
>>> 

Reply via email to